Jay, Please type this up in Bugzilla so we don't forget it. (http://xml.apache.org/fop/bugs.html)--Also include this sample as an attachment to the bug. No time guarantees can be given, however.
In the meantime, Thomas, I don't think I can just switch our SVGElementMapping implementation from SVGDOMImplementation to ExtensibleSVGDOMImplementation because the namespaces are different. I'll need to add another ElementMapping to production and development. *But*, as you can see in our SVGElementMapping implementation, we rely on a constant SVGDOMImplementation.SVG_NAMESPACE_URI. File below: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/extensions/svg/SVGElementMapping.java?rev=1.1&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup To facilitate this change, could you create a similar--of whatever name--namespace constant in your ExtensibleSVGDOMImplementation class--probably it should be "http://xml.apache.org/batik/ext". Thanks, Glen --- Jay Chiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Attached please find a sample fo file with embedded > svg object. > You may also take a look at the batik samples, > xml-batik/samples/extensions/flow/flowtext.svg > > FOP does support the base SVG 1.1 funcationality as > Batik > supports. But SVG 1.1 does not support more flexible > text > feature, such as text can not wrap onto multiple > lines. --- Thomas DeWeese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have to have a > different root document > > for all the batik extension elements, otherwise > the system uses > > SVGDOMImplementation to create generic DOM > element. > > It sounds like you want to make a small change so > FOP uses the > ExensibleSVGDOMImplementation instead of > SVGDOMImplementation for all > the elements. > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]