We can do it this way. But on second thought, I think it would be better for Renaud to move it in as AWTRenderer, and slowly start factoring out more and more while things are getting settled. BTW, this will take some time to do anyway--it isn't easy because the renderers are so different between 0.20.5 and 1.0.
[A note for Renaud: I would recommend cutting down on the chatroom English and instead start writing properly/respectfully to us, in the same manner that all of us have been writing to you. Capitalize "I", the first word of each sentence, your name, our names[1], greetings, etc. Above all, when people write to you in standard polite English, you shouldn't be responding back with chatroom writing. None of us here do. Thanks!] Glen [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-dev&m=110625230922690&w=2 --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given the new layout I don't even need to prepare > anything. It would > only complicate things. Just rename the AWTRenderer > to Java2DRenderer, > move it to the new location, then create an empty > subclass of > Java2DRenderer called AWTRenderer and move any > AWT-dependant code to > that subclass. > > On 22.02.2005 22:43:01 Renaud Richardet wrote: > > Glen Mazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Looks good! Now whether you wish to do this > before or > > > after Renaud moves the logic over is up to you > two. > > > There's advantages/disadvantages to either > method. > > yes, that looks good! > > > > Jeremias, if it's ok for the team, i would > apreciate if you would do > > the changes asap. > > > > thanks, Renaud > > > > Jeremias Maerki > >
