On 14.12.2005 15:56:33 Adam Strzelecki wrote: > > If it were a more invasive hack I would agree however in this case the > > hack is small and isolated and it will enable people to use 'stable' > > releases > > for FOP and Batik which is (right or wrong) important to many people. > Anyway FOP 0.90beta binaries are going to be distributed with binaries > of Batik so in this case if there will be no Batik stable release lets > distribute it with SVN version, it shouldn't be a problem ?
Again, ASF license policy. No more distribution of unreleased code from ASF hardware anymore. But you can use a Batik snapshot internally in your company. > > > > I don't have really strong feelings on this but I think that adding > > the hack is the better solution. > Me neither. > > Regards, > -- > Adam Strzelecki |: nanoant.com :| Jeremias Maerki
