On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 12:01 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Thanks, Peter. I went looking for that reference but wasn't lucky. I
> gave up after almost 30 minutes. Could you dig up that reference for us?
> The only post I found was one by G. Ken Holman which was never answered:
> On 21.06.2006 11:04:53 Peter B. West wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 12:07 +0200, Luca Furini wrote:
> > > Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > >
> > > > > On 19.06.2006 15:45:36 Luca Furini wrote:
> > > > > It seems to me that the prescribed behaviour requires a keep
> > > > > constraint
> > > > > with force = "always" to be satisfied *always* :-), even if this
> > > > > would
> > > > > mean having some overflowing content.
> > > >
> > > > Obviously, we disagree here. I read it so that "always" can also be
> > > > relaxed if the keep cannot be satisfied. Did anyone check what other
> > > > implementations do?
> > >
> > > A quick test shows that AntennaHouse's xslformatter satisfies all the
> > > keeps, even when this means having some content overflow the body region
> > > (the overflowing content is actually clipped), while RenderX's xep
> > > relaxes
> > > a keep constraint in order to avoid overflows.
> > >From memory, this issue was clarified in a posting to the editors list
> > some time ago (2 years or more, I think.) "always" means "always", which
> > makes sense.
I'll see if it's on the laptop at home. All I remember about it was that
it was a reply from one of the editors.
Where were you looking?