On 11.01.2008 11:28:47 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > I think we should start to plan the next release. How about targeting > > the end of February or beginning of March? > > Seems good. > > > > Without much thinking, the following items are on the table: > > - Stabilizing tables. > > - Stabilizing the image package once I've merged the brach into trunk. > > - Verifying the AFP output works correctly. > > > > What else? > > Refactoring the website? I’ve already been told several times that it > was difficult to find its way on it. Last time I mainly rephrased a few > sentences and removed broken links, but didn’t do much more. And > I didn’t even touch the ‘Development’ tab which is progressively > becoming out-of-date. > > Should I add that this is not a trivial task and that I’ll have no time > for that in the next couple of months? :-P
I know a lot more of these little thing we could do. ;-) > I was also thinking about making this a beta release. With the major > changes that we made we can’t be sure that no regression has been > introduced as well. The 0.94 release taught me that even if many bugs > were fixed, users will stumble upon regressions and (rightly) complain > about them. > > So, what about a 0.95 beta? Like Chris, I'd prefer calling it a release candidate, but +1 to the general idea. Jeremias Maerki
