On 11.01.2008 11:28:47 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > I think we should start to plan the next release. How about targeting
> > the end of February or beginning of March?
> Seems good.
> > Without much thinking, the following items are on the table:
> > - Stabilizing tables.
> > - Stabilizing the image package once I've merged the brach into trunk.
> > - Verifying the AFP output works correctly.
> > 
> > What else?
> Refactoring the website? I’ve already been told several times that it 
> was difficult to find its way on it. Last time I mainly rephrased a few 
> sentences and removed broken links, but didn’t do much more. And 
> I didn’t even touch the ‘Development’ tab which is progressively 
> becoming out-of-date.
> Should I add that this is not a trivial task and that I’ll have no time 
> for that in the next couple of months? :-P

I know a lot more of these little thing we could do. ;-)

> I was also thinking about making this a beta release. With the major 
> changes that we made we can’t be sure that no regression has been 
> introduced as well. The 0.94 release taught me that even if many bugs 
> were fixed, users will stumble upon regressions and (rightly) complain 
> about them.
> So, what about a 0.95 beta?

Like Chris, I'd prefer calling it a release candidate, but +1 to the
general idea.

Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to