Dear Fop Devs, i think this was the original intention of a "processing instruction". I really do not see clearly where fox:fail-on-missing-image would go in the fo tree. A PI could mean: From this point on in the whole document. HOWEVER: If fop currently uses no PIs (I am not sure about this), then it should be a fox: extension, to make all behavior similar.
As for the size: - Always use the size given if given. Either: - a 0.0001 x 0.0001 pt empty transparent image OR - A missing image image, about 1x1 cm: should have a border and a red "x" (as seen in web browsers, etc.) On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 07:47 -0800, The Web Maestro wrote: > That all sounds good. As for the extension vs. Config approach, the > config could specify the default behavior & users could override it > via individual fox:image-missing-behavior (or > fox:fail-on-missing-image or something). If there's no > @fox:[image-missing-behavior] specified, it'll do the config setting > or log a warning if nothing specified. > > Clay mfG Max Berger e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- OpenPG ID: E81592BC Print: F489F8759D4132923EC4 BC7E072AB73AE81592BC For information about me and my work please see http://max.berger.name
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil