BTW, if someone would bother to nominate me as a committer, I would be happy to do this work directly. I don't like depending on the other committers to make progress in this area any more than you like having to address it.
G. On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote: > OK, understand on the junit headless issue. For checkstyle/findbugs it > would be useful to fail the nightly build if they do not pass. I will > investigate the necessary changes to enable this option, which I hope can be > adopted. > > G. > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Simon Pepping <spepp...@leverkruid.eu>wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:25:20AM -0700, Glenn Adams wrote: >> > I notice also that the nightly build target does not run all the junit >> > tests. It would be better if it run all of them plus checkstyle and >> > findbugs. >> >> Many junit tests require a display. Nightly builds are run in a >> headless configuration, hence I had to disable many junit tests. At >> nightly builds there is no one to check checkstyle and findbugs errors >> and warnings; therefore there is no point in running them. >> >> Simon >> > >