On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Vincent Hennebert <vhenneb...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 18/07/12 13:46, Alexios Giotis wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 18, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> >
> >> On 18/07/12 01:14, Glenn Adams wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Alexios Giotis <alex.gio...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The end result is to provide a documentation trail. I initially
> replied to
> >>>> this thread because Jira is not (yet) used in FOP and it happens to
> provide
> >>>> this feature.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> FYI, Alex, if you aren't aware of it, the project has already voted to
> move
> >>> to JIRA, and we are awaiting the infrastructure group to perform the
> >>> conversion. [1]
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4800
> >>
> >> What will happen to the current Bugzilla instance? Will it be closed or
> >> made read-only? If it’s closed the whole purpose of putting the Bugzilla
> >> number in the commit message will be defeated.
> >>
> >>
> >> Vincent
> >
> > The existing bugzilla issues will be migrated to Jira. From what I can
> see, Glenn is following the migration steps written in [1]. Related to step
> 2 (Bugzilla data worth it?), Glenn has already answered in INFRA-4800 "(2)
> historical data should be retained".
> >
> > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/general/ApacheBugzillaToJiraMigration
>
> Thanks for the pointer. At the bottom of the page it’s written that the
> Bugzilla instance should be made read-only, which answers my question
> I guess.
>

Correct.

Reply via email to