Does it work a little better with postscript now?
--------------- Martin Edge --------------- On 08/08/2012, at 8:20 PM, Chris Bowditch <bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com> wrote: > On 08/08/2012 02:47, Glenn Adams wrote: > > Hi Glenn, > >> I'd like to survey folks to see what, if any bugs or issues you believe are >> *essential* to be addressed in fop1.1rc1 prior to releasing fop1.1. There >> has been a suggestion to update fop-pdf-images prior to an fop1.1 release. >> Is there someone who would volunteer to do that [real soon now]? Or is it >> better to wait until after fop1.1 is released? Any other "must fix" bugs in >> 1.1rc1? > > Thanks for starting this discussion. I have been meaning to send a similar > e-mail for the last couple of days. In my view the PDF Image Loading issue > (53468) is high priority. A lot of users will want to use this plug-in with > FOP. We are big users of the plug-in too, but don't use the released FOP > versions. > > I can assign Rob to work on it since he is available, but he is not a > committer so won't be able to process the Patch already submitted to 53468. > Vincent can work on it in about 2 weeks time, so I guess who does it depends > on your definition of "real soon now"? > > I guess your call for volunteers means you don't have any free time to invest > in that yourself? > > I'm not aware of any other high priority bugs. User feedback on 1.1rc1 > appears to be a little muted compared to previous releases. Hopefully that is > a sign of improved code quality. > > Thanks, > > Chris > >> >> G. >> >