Does it work a little better with postscript now? 


---------------
Martin Edge
---------------

On 08/08/2012, at 8:20 PM, Chris Bowditch <bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On 08/08/2012 02:47, Glenn Adams wrote:
> 
> Hi Glenn,
> 
>> I'd like to survey folks to see what, if any bugs or issues you believe are 
>> *essential* to be addressed in fop1.1rc1 prior to releasing fop1.1. There 
>> has been a suggestion to update fop-pdf-images prior to an fop1.1 release. 
>> Is there someone who would volunteer to do that [real soon now]? Or is it 
>> better to wait until after fop1.1 is released? Any other "must fix" bugs in 
>> 1.1rc1?
> 
> Thanks for starting this discussion. I have been meaning to send a similar 
> e-mail for the last couple of days. In my view the PDF Image Loading issue 
> (53468) is high priority. A lot of users will want to use this plug-in with 
> FOP. We are big users of the plug-in too, but don't use the released FOP 
> versions.
> 
> I can assign Rob to work on it since he is available, but he is not a 
> committer so won't be able to process the Patch already submitted to 53468. 
> Vincent can work on it in about 2 weeks time, so I guess who does it depends 
> on your definition of "real soon now"?
> 
> I guess your call for volunteers means you don't have any free time to invest 
> in that yourself?
> 
> I'm not aware of any other high priority bugs. User feedback on 1.1rc1 
> appears to be a little muted compared to previous releases. Hopefully that is 
> a sign of improved code quality.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chris
> 
>> 
>> G.
>> 
> 

Reply via email to