Hi Glenn,
besides the fop-pdf-images release I consider the following two bugzilla
issues as important before doing a 1.1 release:
* https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45715
--> I just reopened this issue because it breaks page breaks on table
elements.
* https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48063
--> Since the issue is causing an endless loop, which is not really not
nice ;-), it would be good if someone can process my patch. Thanks to
Luis for adding a proper layout engine test case. My fix might not be
perfect but it fixes at least the endless loop.
Best regards,
Matthias
On 08.08.2012 12:51, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Chris Bowditch
<bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com <mailto:bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
On 08/08/2012 02:47, Glenn Adams wrote:
Hi Glenn,
I'd like to survey folks to see what, if any bugs or issues you
believe are *essential* to be addressed in fop1.1rc1 prior to
releasing fop1.1. There has been a suggestion to update
fop-pdf-images prior to an fop1.1 release. Is there someone who
would volunteer to do that [real soon now]? Or is it better to
wait until after fop1.1 is released? Any other "must fix" bugs
in 1.1rc1?
Thanks for starting this discussion. I have been meaning to send a
similar e-mail for the last couple of days. In my view the PDF Image
Loading issue (53468) is high priority. A lot of users will want to
use this plug-in with FOP. We are big users of the plug-in too, but
don't use the released FOP versions.
I can assign Rob to work on it since he is available, but he is not
a committer so won't be able to process the Patch already submitted
to 53468. Vincent can work on it in about 2 weeks time, so I guess
who does it depends on your definition of "real soon now"?
I guess your call for volunteers means you don't have any free time
to invest in that yourself?
If Rob could apply the patch in his working copy and verify it fixes the
bug and doesn't produce any regressions, then I can commit it. I haven't
personally used the fop-pdf-images extension, so I'd prefer to have
someone who is more familiar with it do a review of the patch.
