Hi, Andreas L Delmelle a écrit : > On Apr 14, 2007, at 20:55, Thomas Zastrow wrote: > >> Andreas L Delmelle wrote: >>> On Apr 14, 2007, at 17:41, Thomas Zastrow wrote: >>> >>>> <snip /> >>>> The files LinLibertine.xml and LinLibertineU-Re-2.2.5.ttf are in the >>>> root-directory of the FOP (version 0.93). The base-tag in the >>>> config-file is untouched, it is still <base>.</base> >>> >>> Keep in mind that they are influenced by <font-base>. I /think/ both >>> of them. At least, I hope so... :/
If <font-base> isn't specified, <base> is used. Otherwise it overrides the value of <base>. >> OK, I added <font-base>.</font-base> to the fop.xconf. But the result is >> the same ... btw., I'm not sure which directory is meant with "."? > > Errm, if I'm correct then the "." is to be interpreted as relative to > the source document... Actually it corresponds to the working directory i.e., the directory from which you launch the command. Which is totally counter-intuitive... According to the URI specification, relative URIs inside the fop.xconf file should be resolved against the URI of the config file itself, which sounds pretty logical. This needs to be improved, but meanwhile the workaround is to use absolute URIs, as you did. <snip/> HTH, Vincent --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
