On 17 October 2016 at 14:12, Lukas Zapletal <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > This appears more inconsistent than the current situation, as there will
> > now be three terms, differing between the UI names ("Foreman Smart
> > Proxy"), API/module names ("smart proxy"), and package names ("foreman
> > proxy").
> That's indeed a very true statement, I'll add that the new term aims to
> be the glue between the other two.

I think I agree with Dominic, a third standard to fix two other standards
is a common mistake.

> To be honest, I'd rather kill "Smart Proxy" than "Foreman Proxy" if I
> had to choose just one.

+1 to that, Foreman Proxy would be my choice.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to