On 17 October 2016 at 14:12, Lukas Zapletal <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > This appears more inconsistent than the current situation, as there will
> > now be three terms, differing between the UI names ("Foreman Smart
> > Proxy"), API/module names ("smart proxy"), and package names ("foreman
> > proxy").
> That's indeed a very true statement, I'll add that the new term aims to
> be the glue between the other two.
I think I agree with Dominic, a third standard to fix two other standards
is a common mistake.
> To be honest, I'd rather kill "Smart Proxy" than "Foreman Proxy" if I
> had to choose just one.
+1 to that, Foreman Proxy would be my choice.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.