On 17 October 2016 at 14:12, Lukas Zapletal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This appears more inconsistent than the current situation, as there will > > now be three terms, differing between the UI names ("Foreman Smart > > Proxy"), API/module names ("smart proxy"), and package names ("foreman > > proxy"). > > That's indeed a very true statement, I'll add that the new term aims to > be the glue between the other two.
I think I agree with Dominic, a third standard to fix two other standards is a common mistake. > To be honest, I'd rather kill "Smart Proxy" than "Foreman Proxy" if I > had to choose just one. +1 to that, Foreman Proxy would be my choice. Greg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
