+1 for Foreman Proxy IMHO the "Smart" word does not add any useful information to the reader.
On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 11:30:35 AM UTC+2, Tomas Strachota wrote: > > On 10/17/2016 03:26 PM, Greg Sutcliffe wrote: > > On 17 October 2016 at 14:12, Lukas Zapletal <[email protected] > <javascript:> > > <mailto:[email protected] <javascript:>>> wrote: > >> > >> > This appears more inconsistent than the current situation, as there > will > >> > now be three terms, differing between the UI names ("Foreman Smart > >> > Proxy"), API/module names ("smart proxy"), and package names > ("foreman > >> > proxy"). > >> > >> That's indeed a very true statement, I'll add that the new term aims to > >> be the glue between the other two. > > > > I think I agree with Dominic, a third standard to fix two other > > standards is a common mistake. > > > >> To be honest, I'd rather kill "Smart Proxy" than "Foreman Proxy" if I > >> had to choose just one. > > > > +1 to that, Foreman Proxy would be my choice. > > +1 for Foreman Proxy > > > > > Greg > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "foreman-dev" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > > an email to [email protected] <javascript:> > > <mailto:[email protected] <javascript:>>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
