+1 for Foreman Proxy On Nov 3, 2016 8:12 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for Foreman Proxy > > IMHO the "Smart" word does not add any useful information to the reader. > > On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 11:30:35 AM UTC+2, Tomas Strachota wrote: >> >> On 10/17/2016 03:26 PM, Greg Sutcliffe wrote: >> > On 17 October 2016 at 14:12, Lukas Zapletal <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> > This appears more inconsistent than the current situation, as there >> will >> >> > now be three terms, differing between the UI names ("Foreman Smart >> >> > Proxy"), API/module names ("smart proxy"), and package names >> ("foreman >> >> > proxy"). >> >> >> >> That's indeed a very true statement, I'll add that the new term aims >> to >> >> be the glue between the other two. >> > >> > I think I agree with Dominic, a third standard to fix two other >> > standards is a common mistake. >> > >> >> To be honest, I'd rather kill "Smart Proxy" than "Foreman Proxy" if I >> >> had to choose just one. >> > >> > +1 to that, Foreman Proxy would be my choice. >> >> +1 for Foreman Proxy >> >> > >> > Greg >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups "foreman-dev" group. >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> > an email to [email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>. >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "foreman-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
