Hi All,
I wil once AGAIN pipe in on this subject as it has been brought up by
me and others time and again. Protel look at 2.8. You could modify
ANY pad or via globally, all the way down the the thermal spokes,
drill size, mask clearance, paste clearance!
While this does not totaly address Mr. Wilsons solution it points Protel
back to its roots where things were easy to do.
Masks are not rules checked, Planes are not rules checked.
Why are they in the rules section?
Hell, Routing rules are not abided by.
Pads, That's the issue. Look at em, they can be on all layers or one. We need
to be able to deal with each as an individual.
Ian Wilson wrote:
>
> Allowing the rules system to recognise that multi-layer (through-hole) pads
> exist on the various copper layers would be a great help and, I think, a
> small but great new feature. There may need to be an option for the layer
> scope to "apply this rule to multi-layer entities".
>
> (The multi-layer layer cannot be specified in the layer-scope - I would
> think it would be a useful further extension to the rules system to allow
> rules to be applied to the multi-layer layer. In this case the rules
> system would need to apply that rule to all the layers of a pad or
> via. This is the opposite to what I am requesting above, where I want the
> rules system to be able split out the multi-layer entities into their
> component layers.)
I Agree, the specific pads that are involved.
>
>
> Ian Wilson
>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To leave this list visit:
* http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/subscrib.html
* - or email -
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=leave%20proteledaforum
*
* Contact the list manager:
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Browse or Search previous postings:
* http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
