Prasanna Gautam wrote:
> homogeniety  is unachievable all over nepal in a similar fashion that New
> York is always the hub of new things even though US is so advanced.. so we
> need to focus on getting people involved.. because a single minded ambition
> for homogeneity will rather hamper growth in the long run. If we can draw up
> a line over what we want to achieve beyond KTM, it can be more practical.
> We, at kathmandu want to be on the very cutting edge but the same can't be
> said true for a person in a rural village (heck most of them don't even have
> basic technological pre-requisite in place)

Another typical Kathmanduite voice I have been hearing all my life.
Please let all of us clear it from our head once and for all that
every place outside Kathmandu isn't a rural village. There are places
more just a few kilometers away from Kathmandu that are more backward
than your average Nepalese village. With this limited knowledge and
sick attitude of your own country, Kathmandu is wort being called a
malinformed and maleducated village in itself, with no realistic
understanding of how the country and its people are.

Comparing Kathmandu with New York doesn't make sense. Compare it with
Thimpu or Adis Ababa. Or maybe Lhasa.
And, let me make it clear, there are places outside kathmandu (not all
are villages and rural) where people are more aware of things going
around the world and in technology. I can only cann it irony that all
of them have to untimately end up in Kathmandu and Kathmanduites
confuse them for being one of their own. There are cities and towns
outside the valley where people study engineering, and do system
administration or programming too. Discussing in a GoogleGroup doesn't
make somebody more aware and at cutting edge than any such guy.

Regards,
Bibek


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
FOSS Nepal mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/foss-nepal

Community website: http://www.fossnepal.org/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to