On Tue, 4 May 2010 15:54:18 +0200, Gour <g...@gour-nitai.com> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:07:06 -0500 >>>>>>> "Joshua" == <jos...@letterblock.com> wrote: > > Hello list, [snip] > Sincerely, > Gour
I'm not clear for what you are going to use this for. If for writing documentation, say a user manual. Then You don't want to use fossil markup. (I use markup in a general sense not a specific product) You might want to use fossil as a scm for storing your documentation files. (Not if you're using native word format :-) If you would use say asciidoc http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/ as fossil markup. Then generating A wikiPAGE could take A long time. Asciidoc is overkill for that purpose. If you would enhance wiki pages for wiki purposes then a markup containing more functions is called for. Richard wants to keep his past documentation efforts. To satisfy that one could add the word <<creole>> to the fossil markup. This would switch (and reset all fossil formating e.g. if your were using bold that is killed. Thus "**switch <<creole>>this is creole back to <<fossil>> fossil again" only switch would be bold) to the already provided creole parser. Which in turn would have to recognize <<fossil>> to switch back. Assuming that the creole functionality satisfies your needs. However nice it is to ramble along, The question is still "what do you want to do with the markup"? Rene _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
