On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Jan Nijtmans <[email protected]>wrote:
> I made one additional change: adding states > UPDATED_BY_INTEGR and ADDED_BY_INTEGR > For a moment i thought you were trying to save 1 byte from INTEGER and i was going to heckle you about it ;). But i see now that it's INTEGRATE. How about ..._BY_INTEGR8? > Still no objections, anyone? I think it's ready to be > integrated into trunk (using "merge --integrate", > of course), but another round of evaluation never hurts! > i like it. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
