2013/7/30 Lluís Batlle i Rossell <[email protected]>: > Why INTEGR, and not INTEGRATE?
2013/7/30 Stephan Beal <[email protected]>: > For a moment i thought you were trying to save 1 byte from INTEGER and i was > going to heckle you about it ;). But i see now that it's INTEGRATE. How > about ..._BY_INTEGR8? LOL Well, the colums are not aligned anyway, so I guess INTEGRATE would be just as well. (An earlier version used ADD_BY_INTEGR/CHG_BY_INTEGR, in an attempt to keep the colums in the output well-aligned) > There is also case -1, -2, -4. Why not -3? There's no need to keep values continuous, just keeping some room for future improvements. -3 is just as good. Thanks! Jan Nijtmans _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
