Dan, I did a test on the remaining installs just to see what other dependencies I might trip over. This is what I have discovered so far ...
1. The UPX RPM is reporting that it requires the following: libucl.so.1 I found a library containing it here: http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/12642221/com/bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386.rpm.html 2. Running a test on "bibletime" spits out the following dependencies rpm -i --test bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libDCOP.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libclucene.so.0 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkdecore.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkdefx.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkdeprint.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkdesu.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkdeui.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkhtml.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkio.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkjs.so.1 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkparts.so.2 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkutils.so.1 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkwalletclient.so.1 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libqt-mt.so.3 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libsword-1.5.9.so is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 I am running off to a meeting - so before I do any searches any ideas on if there is a larger package that contains all of these libraries ? From: "Stangel, Daniel" <[email protected]> To: Matt Taggart <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: 10/26/2009 10:16 PM Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem Sent by: [email protected] On 2009-10-26 Matt Taggart wrote: >> Summarizing the issue you had, and CC'ing the FOSSology mailing list so >> we capture this knowledge for future generations: You found that we >> were missing two RPMs from the list of FO dependencies: libtool-ltdl >> and perl-DateManip. > > Well they are dependencies of our dependencies. If you were using a > package manager that automatically recursively resolved dependencies > (like apt or > yum) they would have just been pulled in. But since you were using rpm > directly, they needed to be installed by hand. > > I would be surprised if these were the only deps-of-deps that were > needed, but maybe you already had some installed. Documenting all of > them is an ongoing chore and might even change over time, so it's > frustrating that it needs to be in our docs (but that par for the RHEL > course). You'll hear no arguments from me on that one. Yum should automatically resolve these on RHEL5/CentOS5 and beyond, so the kind of troubles George is having will gradually go away. Dan P.S. According to http://www.redhat.com/security/updates/errata/ RHEL4 will be completely end-of-life on February 29, 2012. Perhaps we should have a party? _______________________________________________ fossology mailing list [email protected] http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
_______________________________________________ fossology mailing list [email protected] http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
