On 2009-10-27 George Pace wrote: > My bad - was juggling to many things - Forget the link below - looks > like a bible study program that just happens to contain the library I > am looking for. > > So, still searching for the library libucl.so.1 for RHEL5 - And ideally > figuring out what the best RPM (on the Redhat distro is preferable)
Ucl is one that we have found before. According to http://fossology.org/rhel5_1.1 we recommend ftp://ftp.univie.ac.at/systems/linux/dag/redhat/el5/en/i386/RPMS.dag/ucl-1.03-2.el5.rf.i386.rpm (note: you might need to search pbone for a better download site, as this one is not responsive as of this morning) Dan > From: George A Pace <[email protected]> To: "Stangel, > Daniel" > <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected], > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: 10/27/2009 > 08:08 AM Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem Sent by: > [email protected] > > ________________________________ > > > > > > Dan, > > I did a test on the remaining installs just to see what other > dependencies I might trip over. This is what I have discovered > so far ... > > > 1. The UPX RPM is reporting that it requires the following: > > libucl.so.1 > > I found a library containing it here: > > http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/12642221/com/bibletime- > 1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386.rpm.html > <http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/12642221/com/bibletime- > 1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386.rpm.html> > > 2. Running a test on "bibletime" spits out the following dependencies > > rpm -i --test bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > libDCOP.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 > libclucene.so.0 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 > libkdecore.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 > libkdefx.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 > libkdeprint.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 > libkdesu.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 > libkdeui.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 > libkhtml.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 > libkio.so.4 is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkjs.so.1 > is needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkparts.so.2 is > needed by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkutils.so.1 is needed > by bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libkwalletclient.so.1 is needed > by bibletime-1.6.5- 1.rhel5.i386 libqt-mt.so.3 is needed by > bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 libsword-1.5.9.so is needed by > bibletime-1.6.5-1.rhel5.i386 > > I am running off to a meeting - so before I do any searches any ideas > on if there is a larger package that contains all of these libraries ? > > > > From: "Stangel, Daniel" <[email protected]> > To: Matt Taggart <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: 10/26/2009 10:16 PM > Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem > Sent by: [email protected] > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > On 2009-10-26 Matt Taggart wrote: >>> Summarizing the issue you had, and CC'ing the FOSSology mailing list >>> so we capture this knowledge for future generations: You found that >>> we were missing two RPMs from the list of FO dependencies: libtool- >>> ltdl and perl-DateManip. >> >> Well they are dependencies of our dependencies. If you were using a >> package manager that automatically recursively resolved dependencies >> (like apt or yum) they would have just been pulled in. But since you >> were using rpm directly, they needed to be installed by hand. >> >> I would be surprised if these were the only deps-of-deps that were >> needed, but maybe you already had some installed. Documenting all of >> them is an ongoing chore and might even change over time, so it's >> frustrating that it needs to be in our docs (but that par for the RHEL >> course). > > You'll hear no arguments from me on that one. Yum should > automatically resolve these on RHEL5/CentOS5 and beyond, so the kind > of troubles George is having will gradually go away. > > Dan > > P.S. According to http://www.redhat.com/security/updates/errata/ > <http://www.redhat.com/security/updates/errata/> RHEL4 will be > completely end-of-life on February 29, 2012. Perhaps we should have a > party? _______________________________________________ fossology mailing > list [email protected] > http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology > <http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology> > > _______________________________________________ fossology mailing list > [email protected] http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology > <http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology> > > _______________________________________________ fossology mailing list [email protected] http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
