Dan,
A new list of requirements for the FOSSology RPM. Just for reference,
this is a Redhat 5.4 installation.
I am going to check with my Unix team to see if they come with Redhat)
Also, some of these dependencies are interesting as they are already
installed
Postgres - postgresql.i386 0:8.1.18-2.el5_4.1
PHP - php-5.1.6-23.2.el5_3
[r...@njwashld99 installv5]# rpm -qa php
php-5.1.6-23.2.el5_3
[r...@njwashld99 installv5]# rpm -qa perl
perl-5.8.8-27.el5
[r...@njwashld99 installv5]# rpm -qa httpd
httpd-2.2.3-31.el5
[r...@njwashld99 installv5]# rpm -qa php
php-5.1.6-23.2.el5_3
rpm -qa postgres
postgresql.i386 0:8.1.18-2.el5_4.1
rpm -i --test fossology-1.1.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
file-libs is needed by fossology-1.1.0-1.fc11.i586
genisoimage is needed by fossology-1.1.0-1.fc11.i586
libextractor-plugins is needed by fossology-1.1.0-1.fc11.i586
libpq.so.5 is needed by fossology-1.1.0-1.fc11.i586
php-pear >= 5.16 is needed by fossology-1.1.0-1.fc11.i586
php-pgsql >= 5.1.6 is needed by fossology-1.1.0-1.fc11.i586
php-process is needed by fossology-1.1.0-1.fc11.i586
poppler-utils is needed by fossology-1.1.0-1.fc11.i586
postgresql-server >= 8.1.11 is needed by
fossology-1.1.0-1.fc11.i586
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 is needed by
fossology-1.1.0-1.fc11.i586
From:
"Stangel, Daniel" <[email protected]>
To:
Matt Taggart <[email protected]>
Cc:
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date:
10/26/2009 10:16 PM
Subject:
Re: [FOSSology] Some progress .. new problem
Sent by:
[email protected]
On 2009-10-26 Matt Taggart wrote:
>> Summarizing the issue you had, and CC'ing the FOSSology mailing list so
>> we capture this knowledge for future generations: You found that we
>> were missing two RPMs from the list of FO dependencies: libtool-ltdl
>> and perl-DateManip.
>
> Well they are dependencies of our dependencies. If you were using a
> package manager that automatically recursively resolved dependencies
> (like apt or
> yum) they would have just been pulled in. But since you were using rpm
> directly, they needed to be installed by hand.
>
> I would be surprised if these were the only deps-of-deps that were
> needed, but maybe you already had some installed. Documenting all of
> them is an ongoing chore and might even change over time, so it's
> frustrating that it needs to be in our docs (but that par for the RHEL
> course).
You'll hear no arguments from me on that one. Yum should automatically
resolve these on RHEL5/CentOS5 and beyond, so the kind of troubles George
is having will gradually go away.
Dan
P.S. According to http://www.redhat.com/security/updates/errata/ RHEL4
will be completely end-of-life on February 29, 2012. Perhaps we should
have a party?
_______________________________________________
fossology mailing list
[email protected]
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
_______________________________________________
fossology mailing list
[email protected]
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
