Got to chime in on this interesting discussion.

Technical Writer wrote:

In a world in which dynamic online help files are rapidly replacing hard copy 
documents, it seems more useful to focus on developing a skill set that enables 
high-volume production of acceptable quality content, rather than obsessing 
over trivial (to most users) details of grammar, construction, or voice.

I see your point, but I think this is polarizing a non-issue. I don't think 
"high-volume production of acceptable quality content" and "details of grammar, 
construction, or voice" are incompatible goals. If I am hiring a technical 
writer, I want someone who can pay attention to both. In rapid development 
environments (whatever you care to call that model), there are plenty of tools 
to help automate your high-volume production. It doesn't take longer to write 
clearly and consistently. And I don't think you can safely say "the majority of 
users" don't care. Depends on the users. Depends on the product. Personally, I 
can blink at a few errors but when they become egregious, I think "Jeez Louise, 
they can't even run a spell-checker? What other details can't this company be 
bothered with?" The "dynamic online help files" are part of the product, and I 
start to question quality control for the whole product.

Thanks for the thoughtful discussion, everyone.

Dorianne

-----Original Message-----
From: framers-bounces+dorianne.gutierrez=polarislibrary.com at 
lists.frameusers.com 
[mailto:framers-bounces+dorianne.gutierrez=polarislibrary....@lists.frameusers.com]
 On Behalf Of Technical Writer
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 12:37 PM
To: gflato at nanometrics.com; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: radical revamping of techpubs



And I know of a CEO who used to either get there first, or let the wannabes 
struggle over the crumbs. Name of Bill Gates.

Quality is primarily a subjective opinion; witness the 90+% of the population 
of the planet using Windows, despite the occasional Blue Screen of Death, or 
necessary re-booting orre-installing required. Similarly, whether a product is 
crap or not is again an opinion, not an objective evaluation that can applied 
in all cases. The Debian flavor of Linux is considered "the best" by some, and 
"the worst" by some. The opinions are subjective.

Everyone TW wants to believe that he or she is producing quality documentation 
that creates a warm fuzzy in the user, and makes customers-for-life of the 
company that produces whatever is being documented. I simply suggest a reality 
check may be more useful.

If the TW is documenting software, perhaps he or she should change fields to 
one with a slower pace of life (and writing). The option is to accept the 
realities of the marketplace, and how those influence and constrain the 
production of technical documentation. In a world in which dynamic onlne help 
files are rapidly replacing hard copy documents, it seems more useful to focus 
on developing a skill set that enables high-volume production of acceptable 
quality content, rather than obsessing over trivial (to most users) details of 
grammar, construction, or voice.

In that direction may lie the future of TW--get it written, get it online, and 
concentrate on the Pareto principle of satisfying the needs of the majority of 
users rather than obsessing over the subjective opinions of the minority. 



< From: gflato at nanometrics.com> To: tekwrytr at hotmail.com; framers at 
lists.frameusers.com> > ...or similar biggies realize that time-to-market is 
everything, > > Time-to-market is not everything if you sacrifice quality. If 
you're first on the market but your product is crap, the fact that you were 
first on the market is irrelevant. > > I know a CEO who got fired because all 
he cared about is being first on the market but his products were crap and 
failed often. Other company's that were slower to market but turned out quality 
products, stole marketshare from that company. The company almost went under 
until the board of Directors wisely fired him and put a new CEO at the helm.> > 
> -Gillian> > 
_________________________________________________________________
Boo!?Scare away worms, viruses and so much more! Try Windows Live OneCare!
http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/purchase/trial.aspx?s_cid=wl_hotmailnews_______________________________________________


You are currently subscribed to Framers as dorianne.gutierrez at 
polarislibrary.com.

Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.

To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/dorianne.gutierrez%40polarislibrary.com

Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.

Reply via email to