I don't know the current state/whereabouts of his work, but will try to find 
out. He rejoined Canyon when I worked there, and I had a few nice and 
interesting conversations with me, but can't really say I knew him. I like what 
I've seen of his work, and he definitely broke some major ground as a media 
artist, for which he will, I imagine, continue to gain recognition.

I'll do some checking about his work and where it resides. If I can do 
something about it to help, I'll be happy to, and can keep folks posted here if 
I learn anything.

Mark T


On Jul 27, 2013, at 12:38 PM, "Herb Shellenberger" <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> I was typing something to the list earlier, but deleted it because I can't 
> say I'm overly familiar with his work and thought others would be able to 
> contribute more personal or cogent reflections/remembrances. However, as 
> perhaps on the spectrum as a "younger" person (as was mentioned in a previous 
> message), I can say that the work that I have seen of his has affected me 
> greatly. All of the film/video work that I've seen are things we've been able 
> to show here at International House in a variety of contexts. I count seeing 
> 16mm prints of Kusama's Self Obliteration, Turn Turn Turn, Waiting for 
> Commercials and Clarence among my most cherished cinema experiences. As 
> someone who is particularly drawn to psychedelic and visual abstraction in 
> experimental cinema, Yalkut is pretty near the top of my list of filmmakers 
> I'd like to explore much more.
> 
> Here's hoping his archive and oeuvre becomes properly cataloged and 
> accessible to scholars and cinephiles, if not somewhere local to the Ohio 
> community that he fostered for so many years, than somewhere where it might 
> be more accessible to larger numbers, like Anthology, the Academy and so on.
> 
> Herb Shellenberger
> Programs Office Manager
> International House Philadelphia
> 3701 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
> www.ihousephilly.org
> (e) [email protected]
> (ph) 215-895-6575
> 
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: FrameWorks on behalf of Cari Machet
> Sent: Sat 7/27/2013 3:03 PM
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Jud Yalkut RIP
> 
> i dont think it is in another realm > i think we are accountable as a
> community for what happens going forward in regard to his work
> 
> mark is there any info you have on his archive ?? and thanks for posting
> this in the first place
> 
> Cari Machet
> NYC 646-436-7795
> [email protected]
> AIM carismachet
> Skype carimachet - 646-652-6434
> Syria +963-099 277 3243
> Amman +962 077 636 9407
> Berlin +49 152 11779219
> Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>
> 
> Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
> addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
> information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without
> permission is strictly prohibited.
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Walter Ungerer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >  May I add a thought of reflection...
> > I believe every artist is at one point faced with the issue of his/her
> > worth in comparison to others. After all the soul searching peace will come
> > simply in the joy of working. My last correspondence with Jud indicates to
> > me a measure of resolution for him. What happens now is in another realm.
> >
> > Walter Ungerer
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 27July/2013 11:50 AM, Michael Betancourt wrote:
> >
> > I've curated his work on a couple of occasions, and I have to say I don't
> > understand why he isn't as readily available as, for example, Brakhage's
> > film work? (Although I already know the answer to that)
> >
> > In talking with my students, the cut-off seems to be what they can find
> > online easily (or in a DVD they can rent) vs what's shown in galleries or
> > screenings.
> >
> > This whole situation makes me kinda sad, Jud will be missed.
> >
> > Michael Betancourt
> > Savannah, GA USA
> >
> >
> > michaelbetancourt.com
> > twitter.com/cinegraphic | vimeo.com/cinegraphic
> > www.cinegraphic.net | the avant-garde film & video blog
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Al Matthews <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>  > plus i dont know if his work is archived
> >> > maybe at MOMA ? anyone know?
> >>
> >>  Hello all. I do not know and would be interested to hear.
> >>
> >>  Electronic Arts Intermix has a good set of pages
> >> http://www.eai.org/artistSupportDocs.htm?id=257 , though with less
> >> between 1974 and 2004. I wonder if there's not a repository in Ohio?
> >>
> >>   > It might be useful to think about the highly uneven reception some
> >> artists get and the reasons for that.  Perhaps leaving NYC has some effect,
> >> since most of his later career was in flyover country, Ohio.  Or being a
> >> pretty trippy and psychedelic type of maker in some of his work.  Perhaps
> >> some of it was not being written about enough by critics, or curated into
> >> shows often enough, or touring enough.  But some of it must have also been
> >> precisely because of his ease in shifting from one medium to another, and
> >> thus not fitting into "experimental film" in a pure sense because he also
> >> was involved in video and electronic music and image processing.  It's less
> >> the case now, but for a long time there was a lot of purism in film 
> >> circles.
> >>
> >>   All these reasons seem salient to me as well. Speaking to the first
> >> and the last, Ohio has evolved to host for example http://accad.osu.edu/,
> >> so no doubt we agree that it's more flyover country in nyc terms than
> >> electronic arts terms. Surely there's some interesting lag visible here in
> >> Jud Yalkut's readiness to hand, between the centralization that is analog
> >> television and New York and the distributed-global arts presence we're
> >> arriving at by now?
> >>
> >>  I wonder too how much of the anti-artefactual gesture of the video
> >> movement is here in play. Or perhaps that's a broad stroke.
> >>
> >>  > When I heard of his passing, I wondered how many younger folks had
> >> even heard of him, much less seen some of his work.
> >>
> >>  Viewing the work seems the harder bit though, isn't it. It's probably
> >> worth raising my hand to say that, while the distribution channels seem to
> >> exist, at least for certain artefacts, those channels still seem to require
> >> a curator, and I cannot quickly determine if that is for the best.
> >>
> >>  Corrections appreciated.
> >>
> >>  --
> >>  Al Matthews - http://fatmilktv.com
> >>  Atlanta, GA, US  +1 337 214 4688 <%2B1%20337%20214%204688>
> >>
> >>
> >>  On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Cari Machet <[email protected]>wrote:
> >>
> >>> i screened some of his work at some curated shows and i think he was a
> >>> kind genius > that was my experience anyway > thanks for the post about 
> >>> him
> >>> passing > i dont believe in death per say only transformation > i dont
> >>> believe in belief either so... but it is sad to see a life go > though he
> >>> is still with us i think > he is a great spirit art makes shifts in and of
> >>> itself without getting accolades from the constituency
> >>>
> >>>  perhaps a tribute can be made a memorial like we did with brakhage in
> >>> nyc but mark fr the academy can possibly get him in the tribute they have
> >>> at the oscars too plus i dont know if his work is archived > maybe at MOMA
> >>> ? anyone know?
> >>>
> >>> Cari Machet
> >>> NYC 646-436-7795
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> AIM carismachet
> >>> Skype carimachet - 646-652-6434
> >>> Syria +963-099 277 3243 <%2B963-099%20277%203243>
> >>> Amman +962 077 636 9407 <%2B962%20077%20636%209407>
> >>> Berlin +49 152 11779219 <%2B49%20152%2011779219>
> >>> Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>
> >>>
> >>> Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
> >>> addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
> >>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
> >>> information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without
> >>> permission is strictly prohibited.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Chuck Kleinhans <
> >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  On Jul 26, 2013, at 10:46 PM, David Baker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>  How is it possible
> >>>> on an "Experimental Film Discussion List"
> >>>> that so little is said in salute
> >>>> when someone of this singular magnitude
> >>>> of achievement passes into the cosmic ether
> >>>> of eternity?
> >>>>
> >>>>  When I heard of his passing, I wondered how many younger folks had
> >>>> even heard of him, much less seen some of his work.
> >>>>
> >>>>  It might be useful to think about the highly uneven reception some
> >>>> artists get and the reasons for that.  Perhaps leaving NYC has some 
> >>>> effect,
> >>>> since most of his later career was in flyover country, Ohio.  Or being a
> >>>> pretty trippy and psychedelic type of maker in some of his work.  Perhaps
> >>>> some of it was not being written about enough by critics, or curated into
> >>>> shows often enough, or touring enough.  But some of it must have also 
> >>>> been
> >>>> precisely because of his ease in shifting from one medium to another, and
> >>>> thus not fitting into "experimental film" in a pure sense because he also
> >>>> was involved in video and electronic music and image processing.  It's 
> >>>> less
> >>>> the case now, but for a long time there was a lot of purism in film 
> >>>> circles.
> >>>>
> >>>>  Chuck Kleinhans
> >>>>
> >>>>    _______________________________________________
> >>>> FrameWorks mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> FrameWorks mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FrameWorks mailing 
> > [email protected]https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FrameWorks mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> >
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FrameWorks mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to