> >Here is a patch for your megapatch at
> >http://people.FreeBSD.org/~iwasaki/acpi/patch-for-megapatch.diff
> >I'll be happy if you accept and commit this :-)
> >
>
> I think it is better bus attachment code is in MD part than in MI part.
> And MD bus attachment code calls MI bus attachment code.
>
> For example,Current acpi_probe code rename to acpi_probesubr and
> call it from acpi_probe in acpi_machdep.c .
Hmm, I think you're talking about BI/BD. Most of ACPI code must be
shared between IA32/IA64 (even bus interface code). Difference between
them is very limited, we can put them in acpi_machdep.c. I like this
model. NetBSD's pci code take this one (dev/pci/pci.c has MI code
like pcimattach(), arch/*/pci/pci_machdep.c have a set of MD
sub-routines for the specific machine architecture such as
pci_conf_read().). I'm not sure this is correct or not, but it seems
reasonable for me.
> And probe method and identify method should not be confused.
> Memory area check etc.... can be in MD acpi probe code.
Yes, I think it's in acpi_machdep.c :-)
if not, which one?
Thanks
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
