On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 11:22:17AM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> Basically, /usr/local is for anything the local administration wants to
> officially support. The ports use of this (and by extension,
> pre-compiled ports (packages)) is thus completely justified.
Do you understandy why NetBSD's Packages install in /usr/pkg ?
What is your position behind that?
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Joe Kelsey
- /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse Brian Dean
- Re: /usr/local abuse Blaz Zupan
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Wes Peters
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Will Andrews
- /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Joe Kelsey
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Crist J. Clark
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Warner Losh
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse Nate Williams
