On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 09:53:22AM +0200, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote: > You know, I have been using and NSD, at work on IRIX. I had trouble > with it, it sometimes wouldn't sync with the nameserver, or would > cease to serve any names until I HUPed it. > > And, seriously, I don't really understand what it's good for. Bind > has been responsible for resolving host names as long as I know. WHY > would anyone want to use NIS for hostname resolution? > > I always configure the resolver to use bind (aka named), and have NIS > resolve passwd, group, alias maps etc. if I need that functionality. > When I'm worried about network load, I run a local named in caching > only mode. Named makes a nice system-wide cache, it is maintained > well, so why bother and write another daemon for that? > > -- > Regards, > Georg.
I believe nscd (on solaris at least) caches NIS information only and has nothing to do with named. -- Vladimir To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message