On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Good idea.
> Unforunatly someone tried to complie a libc_r with the old queue.h and it
> had the same problem (or so they said).
Well, it certainly looks wrong to use TAILQ_REMOVE inside of
TAILQ_FOREACH, so either libc_r should be changed or queue.h
should be reverted.
Also, enabling the queue macro debugging will definitely break
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Ian Dowse wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
> > lian Elischer writes:
> > >The big problem at the moment is that something in the
> > >source tree as a whole, and probably something that came in with KSE
> > >is stopping us from successfully compiling a working libc_r.
> > >(a bit ironic really).
> > Is the new
> > (elm)->field.tqe_next = (void *)-1;
> > in TAILQ_REMOVE a likely candidate? That could easily tickle old
> > bugs in other code. The libc_r code does use a lot of TAILQ macros.
> > Ian
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message