ok, so you are saying that GNOME stuff works fine? What do yuo have running and is there still anything that does the wrong thing?
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Wesley Morgan wrote: > After reading this... I got to thinking, and I copied the old headers into > the wrong place. After rebuilding, it works fine :)... That's what I get > for doing it at 2am! My fault, you guys could have fixed this almost > immediately except for some bad info from me. > > Good idea. > > > > Unforunatly someone tried to complie a libc_r with the old queue.h and > > it had the same problem (or so they said). > > > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: > > > >> In message > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju > >> lian Elischer writes: > >> >The big problem at the moment is that something in the > >> >source tree as a whole, and probably something that came in with KSE > >> >is stopping us from successfully compiling a working libc_r. > >> >(a bit ironic really). > >> > >> Is the new > >> > >> (elm)->field.tqe_next = (void *)-1; > >> > >> in TAILQ_REMOVE a likely candidate? That could easily tickle old bugs > >> in other code. The libc_r code does use a lot of TAILQ macros. > >> > >> Ian > >> > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
