After reading this... I got to thinking, and I copied the old headers into
the wrong place. After rebuilding, it works fine :)... That's what I get
for doing it at 2am! My fault, you guys could have fixed this almost
immediately except for some bad info from me.
> Good idea.
> Unforunatly someone tried to complie a libc_r with the old queue.h and
> it had the same problem (or so they said).
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Ian Dowse wrote:
>> In message
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ju
>> lian Elischer writes:
>> >The big problem at the moment is that something in the
>> >source tree as a whole, and probably something that came in with KSE
>> >is stopping us from successfully compiling a working libc_r.
>> >(a bit ironic really).
>> Is the new
>> (elm)->field.tqe_next = (void *)-1;
>> in TAILQ_REMOVE a likely candidate? That could easily tickle old bugs
>> in other code. The libc_r code does use a lot of TAILQ macros.
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message