Corey Mosher writes: > What would actually be quite nice is to have a fancy GUI install > in addition to the current one. Then at the beginning of the > install you can decide whether you really want to install FreeBSD > or look at the pretty lights in the fancy GUI version. Option 1 > is choose the current way, option 2 is go the GUI method. This > gives people the flexible "old fashioned" way to install while at > the same time getting people through the install who may be less > experienced buy using the GUI version.
There's an additional variable here, that I haven't seen anybody mention. It is desirable to have a uniform installation process, no matter what the media. This means the hard-working folks in Release Engineering only have to wrangle one set of code. It is also desirable to have a small installation process, so deisrable I think this is a matter of official policy. (Can anyone confirm or deny this?) As of ... somewhere late in 3.x or early in 4.x, I think ... one could run the entire essential install off one 3.5 floppy. Then it was two. Now it's three, if you need some not-so-uncommon drivers. Will the sky fall if we go to four? No. But "cost" of each additional disk goes up. I don't assume everyone has a 52x CDROM, any more than I assume thay have a 3mbps cable connection. (I'm neither for or against a GUI installer. I just want to be sure we're all playing with the same deck.) Robert Huff _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"