<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
"Joan Creus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ><URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 > > >I think you mean EFT_VETERAN_BUILD. That sounds right. >I would try to make it shorter, though. >I think your suggestion is great for the general manual, but here we are >dealing with the individual unit help. The original sentence ("may become >veteran throught training or combat") was definitely too short, but this is >probably too much. And we have to think that this will be read by complete >newbies. You don't want to bother them with rulesets. I see what you mean. I overlooked the fact that this text is for the unit help. >I see your point, though. Borrowing also from Randy's, how about: > >Will be built as a veteran in certain cities (see Barracks, and Sun Tzu). >May also become veteran if it defeats an enemy unit. > >I don't like the "certain" word, but it's a start. I think it's important to >refer them to other parts of the manual, where they will get the full >explanation, while keeping it short. Instead of "certain cities", how about 1) "cities with appropriate training facilities", 2) "properly equipped cities", or 3) "appropriately equipped cities"? -Eddie _______________________________________________ Freeciv-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
