<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >

"Joan Creus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>

><URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >

>

>I think you mean EFT_VETERAN_BUILD.



     That sounds right.



>I would try to make it shorter, though.

>I think your suggestion is great for the general manual, but here we are

>dealing with the individual unit help. The original sentence ("may become

>veteran throught training or combat") was definitely too short, but this is

>probably too much. And we have to think that this will be read by complete

>newbies. You don't want to bother them with rulesets.



    I see what you mean.  I overlooked the fact that this text is

for the unit help.



>I see your point, though. Borrowing also from Randy's, how about:

>

>Will be built as a veteran in certain cities (see Barracks, and Sun Tzu).

>May also become veteran if it defeats an enemy unit.

>

>I don't like the "certain" word, but it's a start. I think it's important to

>refer them to other parts of the manual, where they will get the full

>explanation, while keeping it short.



     Instead of "certain cities", how about



1) "cities with appropriate training facilities",



2) "properly equipped cities", or



3) "appropriately equipped cities"?



-Eddie



_______________________________________________
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

Reply via email to