<URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
"Joan Creus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
><URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831 >
>I think you mean EFT_VETERAN_BUILD.
That sounds right.
>I would try to make it shorter, though.
>I think your suggestion is great for the general manual, but here we are
>dealing with the individual unit help. The original sentence ("may become
>veteran throught training or combat") was definitely too short, but this is
>probably too much. And we have to think that this will be read by complete
>newbies. You don't want to bother them with rulesets.
I see what you mean. I overlooked the fact that this text is
for the unit help.
>I see your point, though. Borrowing also from Randy's, how about:
>Will be built as a veteran in certain cities (see Barracks, and Sun Tzu).
>May also become veteran if it defeats an enemy unit.
>I don't like the "certain" word, but it's a start. I think it's important to
>refer them to other parts of the manual, where they will get the full
>explanation, while keeping it short.
Instead of "certain cities", how about
1) "cities with appropriate training facilities",
2) "properly equipped cities", or
3) "appropriately equipped cities"?
Freeciv-dev mailing list