Trying to determine the correct uses or the amount of correct usage for an emerging technology is probably a mistake. AI tools (not "clankers" please, that's a trendy but worthless term) are changing rapidly.
Consider doing the following: - The person who submits the code must acknowledge if an AI tool was used, and to what extent. (Did it generate code? Test cases? Language translation?) - That person takes responsibility for the code, as they are the one that submitted it and invoked the AI tooling. - *No code gets accepted unless it is reviewed by a human.* This is the big one as it hopefully filters out code that is incomplete or possibly dangerous. Many people are using AI tools, but they don't know how to evaluate the output. Human review by a domain expert is needed. - The code may be removed in the future if the AI contribution to it becomes problematic. (I'm thinking about copyright issues here.) Ultimately, accepting code or contributions is an editorial process. The editor has the right to accept or reject for many different reasons, and using AI tech is just another factor in that decision process. -Mike
_______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
