Thanks for this reasonable response and input, Michael. To add to that, SFC just published their recommendations -
https://sfconservancy.org/llm-gen-ai/llm-backed-generative-ai-recommendations.html On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 9:14 AM Michael Brutman via Freedos-devel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Trying to determine the correct uses or the amount of correct usage for an > emerging technology is probably a mistake. AI tools (not "clankers" please, > that's a trendy but worthless term) are changing rapidly. > > Consider doing the following: > > The person who submits the code must acknowledge if an AI tool was used, and > to what extent. (Did it generate code? Test cases? Language translation?) > That person takes responsibility for the code, as they are the one that > submitted it and invoked the AI tooling. > *No code gets accepted unless it is reviewed by a human.* This is the big > one as it hopefully filters out code that is incomplete or possibly > dangerous. Many people are using AI tools, but they don't know how to > evaluate the output. Human review by a domain expert is needed. > The code may be removed in the future if the AI contribution to it becomes > problematic. (I'm thinking about copyright issues here.) > > Ultimately, accepting code or contributions is an editorial process. The > editor has the right to accept or reject for many different reasons, and > using AI tech is just another factor in that decision process. > > > -Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
