On 11/8/2017 6:07 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
> Hi again,
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Ralf Quint <freedos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 11/8/2017 10:26 AM, Jim Hall wrote:
>>> Not sure why DeSmet wasn't well received long ago, but I think this is
>>> a Good Thing to see. I'd love to see DeSmet included in the next FreeDOS.
> It's very minimal, maybe too minimal. It wasn't packaged well. The
> popular "shareware" version (PCC) back in the day (e.g. on Simtel) was
> lacking even more:
> http://reimagery.com/fsfd/bin/Simtel_DOS_1993/simtel/simtel20/MSDOS/C/PCC12C.ZIP
I stopped reading your reply at that point, as it clearly shows that you
haven't really looked at it at all. The shareware version is equivalent
to the pre-ANSI 2.51 version. You are comparing apples and oranges, and
contrary to your statement in another reply, all you do is complaining.


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
Freedos-user mailing list

Reply via email to