On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 11/04/2014 11:25 AM, Roman Naumenko wrote:
----- Original Message -----
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Roman Naumenko wrote:
You definitely can set up separate instances of 389-ds. Preferably
this should be done on separate hosts than IPA masters because
otherwise you'll have a number of practical issues with different
instances binding to the same LDAP/LDAPS ports and so  on.
Is 389-ds equivalent of RedHat Directory Server
(http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/cloud-computing/directory-server)?
Red Hat Directory Server is what is known as 389 Directory Server
(389-ds) upstream project. Essentially, it is the same code. If you
have
specific questions about support of Red Hat Directory Server, I'd
suggest you to ask them Red Hat sales/support people (of which I'm
neither one). ;)
Not necessarily sales people have to be involved, Centos has the same project :)
I'm pondering what's the difference between Centos and Red Hat versions.


RHDS is the layered product.
It has 389DS package but also some other tools and utilities that are not a part of core RHEL and thus not in CentOS.
It is usable but would be harder to manage without additional tools.
And to add to that, CentOS only has what is in the core RHEL:
https://git.centos.org/log/rpms!389-ds-base/refs!heads!c7
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy

--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go To http://freeipa.org for more info on the project

Reply via email to