----- Original Message ----- > On 11/04/2014 05:28 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote: > > On 11/04/2014 11:25 AM, Roman Naumenko wrote: > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> On Tue, 04 Nov 2014, Roman Naumenko wrote: > >>>>> You definitely can set up separate instances of 389-ds. > >>>>> Preferably > >>>>> this should be done on separate hosts than IPA masters because > >>>>> otherwise you'll have a number of practical issues with > >>>>> different > >>>>> instances binding to the same LDAP/LDAPS ports and so on. > >>>> Is 389-ds equivalent of RedHat Directory Server > >>>> (http://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/cloud-computing/directory-server)? > >>>> > >>> Red Hat Directory Server is what is known as 389 Directory Server > >>> (389-ds) upstream project. Essentially, it is the same code. If > >>> you > >>> have > >>> specific questions about support of Red Hat Directory Server, I'd > >>> suggest you to ask them Red Hat sales/support people (of which > >>> I'm > >>> neither one). ;) > >> Not necessarily sales people have to be involved, Centos has the > >> same > >> project :) > >> I'm pondering what's the difference between Centos and Red Hat > >> versions. > > > > RHDS is the layered product. > > It has 389DS package but also some other tools and utilities that > > are > > not a part of core RHEL and thus not in CentOS. > > However, they are in EPEL - 389-console, 389-admin, etc.
You lost me :) Am I understand correctly that everything is equal between centos and redhat directory servers, but redhat will have more stable code? --Roman -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go To http://freeipa.org for more info on the project