OK, everything is clear now.
Thank you again. :)

2015-04-28 14:16 GMT+03:00 Alexander Bokovoy <aboko...@redhat.com>:

> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Арсений Черняков wrote:
>> Thank you for quick response. So, did I got it right, that this limitation
>> is affecting only RedHat support agreement, and not the technical side of
>> configuration? We're considering the CentOS 7 deployment, and we don't
>> have
>> Red Hat support agreement.
> Technically 389-ds can address up to 65535 replicas but this says
> nothing about actual performance which is always a function of your
> workload, environment, and a number of other factors.
> If you hit any issues, without support contract they would be handled by
> a community -- where we all are -- and may involve longer time. I hope it
> is clear as people involved are giving out their volunteering effort.
>  Maybe it's a stupid question, but since we don't have support agreement,
>> can I still ask questions in RedHat mailing list? (I haven't found any
>> forums/KBs/mailing lists dedicated solely to freeIPA and CentOS).
> This mailing list is part of FreeIPA community, we see here a lot of
> questions from different parties using different distributions. It is
> hosted by Red Hat but not really tied to Red Hat.
> Still, if you have concerns on getting your whole infrastructure
> depending on free software solutions, there are solution providers that
> would be happy to help you in deploying and supporting them. Just don't
> expect their contract obligations necessarily extend to the community
> mailing list.  :)
> --
> / Alexander Bokovoy

С уважением,
Черняков А.В.
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project

Reply via email to