Pate Mark-marpate1 wrote:
I used only NAS-Port&NAS-IP-Address with radclient and it seem enough to allocate an IP from the pool:
Sending Access-Request of id 69 to 127.0.0.1:1812 User-Name =
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" User-Password = "xxxxxx" Calling-Station-Id =
"250097000002749" Framed-Protocol = PPP Service-Type = Framed-User NAS-IP-Address = 212.119.97.86 NAS-Port = 55 rad_recv: Access-Accept packet
from host 127.0.0.1:1812, id=69, length=44 Service-Type = Framed-User Framed-Protocol = PPP Framed-IP-Address = 212.119.124.33 Framed-IP-Netmask
= 255.255.255.255
What if you send another access-request with the same nas-port value - you get the same IP address? Cisco seem to have a problem with the way that they
oops. Second request gives another address, but third request gives the same as it was in the first. Not good.
use nas-port on the GGSN and possibly the PDSN. You need to check with Cisco that the nas-port value is changed for each subscriber.
nas-port is different, but it is missed in access-request as long as nas-port-id. I've only nas-port and only in accounting request. Too bad.
Mark
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-- SY, Alexander
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
