then it's not rerunning the -cp. And is it really wm if it's that dark?
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:

Bruce,no the intensity is lesser then 110 at those voxels, it's like 60-70.
Claudia


2013/4/29 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
      is the intensity at those voxels 110 after you have processed
      with autorecon2-cp?
      On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:

            The problem is that after editng manually WM by
            adding control points, I
            still have some WM and GM areas not included in
            either the pial or WM
            boundaries, but I can see that there are control
            points added (green
            cosses), but they seem  not to be processed by the
            autorecon2-cp autorecon3.
            Thanks
            Claudia



            2013/4/29 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
                  Hi Claudia

                  can you describe the problems? And cc the list
            so that others
                  can help?
                  thanks
                  Bruce

                  On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:

                  Hi Bruce,I think wm.mgz it's accurate enough,
            but what you
                  mean?
                  I'm trying to upload data, but I've problems
            with your
                  server.
                  Cheers,
                  Claudia


                  2013/4/29 Bruce Fischl
            <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
                        Hi Claudia

                        it really depends on the individual case
            and what's
                  causing the
                        exclusion. Does the wm.mgz look
            accurate? If so, you
                  may have a
                        topological defect that is being fixed
            incorrectly.
                  Usually we
                        focus on fixing the white boundary and
            that will
                  also correct
                        the pial. You can set the expected gray
            matter
                  intensities in
                        the xopts file, but that is rarely
            necessary and
                  only if your
                        gray matter looks very different than
            the sequences
                  we are used
                        to.

                        If you can't sort it out feel free to
            upload you
                  data.

                        cheers
                        Bruce


                        On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia Dacquino
            wrote:

                              Hi Freesurfers,I have a question
            about pial
                  editing.
                              I have some reconructions in which
            there's a
                  lot of
                              grey matter excluded,
                              and consequently white metter too.
            I did
                  correct
                              these images manually by
                              control points editing, and then
            autorecon2-cp
                              autorecon3, but some cortical
                              grey matter continues to not be
            included in
                  the pial
                              surface, and I have
                              white matter areas that are still
            not included
                  in
                              either the pial or white
                              matter boundaries. 
                              Is there anyother ethods for
            adding grey
                  matter in
                              the pial surfeces other
                              than editing control points (such
            as by
                  editing
                              voxels to add grey matter),
                              or something like that?
                              Thanks for your help.
                              Claudia




                  The information in this e-mail is intended
            only for the
                  person to whom
                  it is
                  addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent
            to you in
                  error and the
                  e-mail
                  contains patient information, please contact
            the Partners
                  Compliance
                  HelpLine at
                  http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If
            the e-mail was
                  sent to you
                  in error
                  but does not contain patient information,
            please contact
                  the sender
                  and properly
                  dispose of the e-mail.







_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to