But in "brainmask.mgz lh.white -aux T1.mgz -aux-surface rh.white
-segmentation aseg.mgz" it's labeled as white matter, could it be possible?


2013/4/29 Claudia Dacquino <claudia.dacqu...@gmail.com>

> Actually it could not be WM, but I'm quite sure that there is grey matter
> excluded by pial bounaries as well, how can I add that?
>
>
> 2013/4/29 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>
>> visually is the only way. Do you think it is white matter?
>>
>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:
>>
>>  Yes it's my doubt too, but how can I check this?
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/4/29 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>       then it's not rerunning the -cp. And is it really wm if it's
>>>       that dark?
>>>       On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:
>>>
>>>       Bruce,no the intensity is lesser then 110 at those voxels,
>>>       it's like 60-70.
>>>       Claudia
>>>
>>>
>>>       2013/4/29 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>             is the intensity at those voxels 110 after you have
>>>       processed
>>>             with autorecon2-cp?
>>>             On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia Dacquino wrote:
>>>
>>>                   The problem is that after editng manually WM
>>>       by
>>>                   adding control points, I
>>>                   still have some WM and GM areas not included
>>>       in
>>>                   either the pial or WM
>>>                   boundaries, but I can see that there are
>>>       control
>>>                   points added (green
>>>                   cosses), but they seem  not to be processed by
>>>       the
>>>                   autorecon2-cp autorecon3.
>>>                   Thanks
>>>                   Claudia
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                   2013/4/29 Bruce Fischl
>>>       <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>                         Hi Claudia
>>>
>>>                         can you describe the problems? And cc
>>>       the list
>>>                   so that others
>>>                         can help?
>>>                         thanks
>>>                         Bruce
>>>
>>>                         On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia Dacquino
>>>       wrote:
>>>
>>>                         Hi Bruce,I think wm.mgz it's accurate
>>>       enough,
>>>                   but what you
>>>                         mean?
>>>                         I'm trying to upload data, but I've
>>>       problems
>>>                   with your
>>>                         server.
>>>                         Cheers,
>>>                         Claudia
>>>
>>>
>>>                         2013/4/29 Bruce Fischl
>>>                   <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>>                               Hi Claudia
>>>
>>>                               it really depends on the
>>>       individual case
>>>                   and what's
>>>                         causing the
>>>                               exclusion. Does the wm.mgz look
>>>                   accurate? If so, you
>>>                         may have a
>>>                               topological defect that is being
>>>       fixed
>>>                   incorrectly.
>>>                         Usually we
>>>                               focus on fixing the white boundary
>>>       and
>>>                   that will
>>>                         also correct
>>>                               the pial. You can set the expected
>>>       gray
>>>                   matter
>>>                         intensities in
>>>                               the xopts file, but that is rarely
>>>                   necessary and
>>>                         only if your
>>>                               gray matter looks very different
>>>       than
>>>                   the sequences
>>>                         we are used
>>>                               to.
>>>
>>>                               If you can't sort it out feel free
>>>       to
>>>                   upload you
>>>                         data.
>>>
>>>                               cheers
>>>                               Bruce
>>>
>>>
>>>                               On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Claudia
>>>       Dacquino
>>>                   wrote:
>>>
>>>                                     Hi Freesurfers,I have a
>>>       question
>>>                   about pial
>>>                         editing.
>>>                                     I have some reconructions in
>>>       which
>>>                   there's a
>>>                         lot of
>>>                                     grey matter excluded,
>>>                                     and consequently white
>>>       metter too.
>>>                   I did
>>>                         correct
>>>                                     these images manually by
>>>                                     control points editing, and
>>>       then
>>>                   autorecon2-cp
>>>                                     autorecon3, but some
>>>       cortical
>>>                                     grey matter continues to not
>>>       be
>>>                   included in
>>>                         the pial
>>>                                     surface, and I have
>>>                                     white matter areas that are
>>>       still
>>>                   not included
>>>                         in
>>>                                     either the pial or white
>>>                                     matter boundaries.
>>>                                     Is there anyother ethods for
>>>                   adding grey
>>>                         matter in
>>>                                     the pial surfeces other
>>>                                     than editing control points
>>>       (such
>>>                   as by
>>>                         editing
>>>                                     voxels to add grey matter),
>>>                                     or something like that?
>>>                                     Thanks for your help.
>>>                                     Claudia
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>                         The information in this e-mail is
>>>       intended
>>>                   only for the
>>>                         person to whom
>>>                         it is
>>>                         addressed. If you believe this e-mail
>>>       was sent
>>>                   to you in
>>>                         error and the
>>>                         e-mail
>>>                         contains patient information, please
>>>       contact
>>>                   the Partners
>>>                         Compliance
>>>                         HelpLine at
>>>                         
>>> http://www.partners.org/**complianceline<http://www.partners.org/complianceline>.
>>>       If
>>>                   the e-mail was
>>>                         sent to you
>>>                         in error
>>>                         but does not contain patient
>>>       information,
>>>                   please contact
>>>                         the sender
>>>                         and properly
>>>                         dispose of the e-mail.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to