Pieter, 

 

You might want to join us tomorrow for the vFRIAM meeting.  We could use some 
new blood. 

 

Bill McCallum is usually there; he da materials guy.  

 

See Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> 

 

Nick 

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Pieter Steenekamp
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 1:44 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] A Theory of (Almost) Everything - IEEE Spectrum

 

Nick,

Simple, because the technology to get copper out of the earth and convert it 
into a usable form is developing faster than population rise and supplies 
dwindling.
My argument is that exactly this has been happening for centuries, why would it 
suddenly stop now? 
Going back to the 1980 bet between Simon and Ehlrig 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon%E2%80%93Ehrlich_wager. According to Ehlrig 
we should have run out of resources long ago, but technological development 
made a big difference. Another example, the US was on her way to run out of oil 
a couple of decades ago and is now an exporter of oil. 

I repeat, I'm not saying it WILL happen. All I'm saying is not to assume 
technological development HAS to end end doom HAS to happen. We just don't know 
what the future will bring and there are people like David Deutsch that see a 
very bright future for humanity. 

Back to copper, I quote from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_copper :

 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Lincoln_Simon> Julian Simon was a senior 
fellow at the  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cato_Institute> Cato Institute 
and a professor of business and economics. In his book  
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ultimate_Resource> The Ultimate Resource 2 
(first printed in 1981 and reprinted in 1998), he extensively criticizes the 
notion of "peak resources", and uses copper as one example. He argues that, 
even though "peak copper" has been a persistent scare since the early 20th 
century, "known reserves" grew at a rate that outpaced demand, and the price of 
copper was not rising but falling over the long run. For example, even though 
world production of copper in 1950 was only one-eighth of what it was in 
early-2000s, known reserves were also much lower at the time – around 100 
million metric tons – making it appear that the world would run out of copper 
in 40 to 50 years at most.

Simon's own explanation for this development is that the very notion of known 
reserves is deeply flawed, 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_copper#cite_note-39> [39] as it does not 
take into account changes in mining profitability. As richer mines are 
exhausted, developers turn their attention to poorer sources of the element and 
eventually develop cheap methods of extracting it, raising known reserves. 
Thus, for example, copper was so abundant 5000 years ago, occurring in pure 
form as well as in highly concentrated copper ores, that prehistoric peoples 
were able to collect and process it with very basic technology. As of the early 
21st century, copper is commonly mined from ores that contain 0.3% to 0.6% 
copper by weight. Yet, despite the material being far less widespread, the cost 
of, for example, a copper pot was vastly lower in the late 20th century than 
5000 years ago. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_copper#cite_note-40> [40]

Simon essentially states that not all viable copper has been discovered and 
that not all technological advancements in mining and refining have occurred, 
so statements that the point of peak copper has been or will be reached must be 
false. Simon supports his argument by showing that copper supplies have 
increased and prices have fallen.

 

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 21:13, <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Pieter,

 

I meant the “has to be” a bit ironically.  The sound of an ugly fact puncturing 
a beautiful theory.  Psssssst! 

 

If I were to believe that populations were rising, that copper use was rising,  
that copper supplies were flat or dwindling, why would I not expect copper 
prices to be rising?  

 

Which of my assumptions is wrong.  

 

Or is it your expectation that we will develop a plastic with the conductive 
properties of copper? 

 

 

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On 
Behalf Of Pieter Steenekamp
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 1:03 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] A Theory of (Almost) Everything - IEEE Spectrum

 

Nick,

I'm not with you, what HAS to be wrong?

It's impossible to predict the future, anything could happen. I'm particularly 
attracted to the views of David Deutsch. I quote from his 
https://www.thebeginningofinfinity.com/ :
"  The resulting stream of ever-improving explanations has potentially  
infinite reach: we are subject only to the laws of physics, and they impose no 
upper limit to what we can eventually understand, control, and achieve.  "

Life on earth is good and is getting better and better for all of us. Sure, a 
disaster could strike, nothing is inevitable, but I can see no reason why the 
progress we have made HAS to stop. Why?

 

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 20:11, <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Pieter,

 

That just HAS to be wrong.  What am I missing, here?  NOT a rhetorical 
question. 

 

Does anybody know, in orders of magnitude, the relation between the potential 
rooftop gain and the total energy needs of a place like Santa Fe?

 

N

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On 
Behalf Of Pieter Steenekamp
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 11:58 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] A Theory of (Almost) Everything - IEEE Spectrum

 

Yeah, just like we were seriously running out of stuff in 1980
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon%E2%80%93Ehrlich_wager
But of course, it's different this time around

 

On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 19:41, Merle Lefkoff <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Nick, I think we have an energy supply problem.  We don't have enough stuff 
left in the ground to dig up to supply our technology much longer at a price 
anyone can afford.  I have a colleague who has calculated that we will run out 
of copper in three years, as just one example.  My understanding is that copper 
wire conducts most of our electricity.   

 

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:17 AM <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Merle, and all, 

 

A naïve question:  Do we have an energy supply problem or do we have an energy 
distribution problem?   For starters, let there be a solar collector on the 
roof of every house in santa fe, roughly the area of the roof (roofly the area 
of the rough?) .  Assuming energy were entirely miscible, what proportion of 
the total energy needs (except food, of course) of Santa Feans would that 
generate.  I assume hundreds of percents, right?  

 

N

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On 
Behalf Of Merle Lefkoff
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 10:51 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] A Theory of (Almost) Everything - IEEE Spectrum

 

Almost, but not quite, Jochen.  He doesn't know about embodied energy.  A motor 
car has an embodied energy contents of 20 800k kWh, while an electric car's 
embodied energy amounts to 34 700 kWh.  Perhaps if he knew this he wouldn't be 
so optimistic.  We are racing toward our doom.

 

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:06 AM Jochen Fromm <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Interesting IEEE podcast: an interview with Václav Smil, who wrote a book about 
"Grand Transitions", similar to "The Major Transitions in Evolution" from John 
Maynard Smith and Eörs Szathmáry 

https://spectrum.ieee.org/podcast/geek-life/history/a-theory-of-almost-everything

 

-J.

 

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> 
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/




 

-- 

Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org <http://emergentdiplomacy.org> 

Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA


mobile:  (303) 859-5609
skype:  merle.lelfkoff2

twitter: @merle110

 

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> 
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/




 

-- 

Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.
Center for Emergent Diplomacy
emergentdiplomacy.org <http://emergentdiplomacy.org> 

Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA


mobile:  (303) 859-5609
skype:  merle.lelfkoff2

twitter: @merle110

 

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> 
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> 
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> 
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to