He did already. I checked, curious myself.
Second item mentions the IDF training.

Refs:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/attackonlondon/story/0,16132,1534779,00.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/attackonlondon/story/0,16132,1534753,00.html

Also remember that the "some" Israeli commando training occurred at Ft Bragg
just before troops were deployed in 2003.

I'm not blaming the IDF for training where they've been invited to share
what they've learned about guerrilla warfare, as long as it includes
learning from their mistakes as well. Since 2003 the IDF has had its own
share of remorse experiences, both internally and externally.

But I do blame the zealotry of some in the US administration for rushing
into a cyclone, using tactics that inflamed rather then becalmed the
citizens they were occupying.  Rumsfeld and Campone did not relieve Boynton
of duty after his misguided public statements revealed his 'God is my
trigger finger' zeitgeist. They've not honestly addressed the panicked
policy overreactions that led to Abu Ghraib, which we know were practiced at
Gitmo first. The only reason Gonzales may not have been Bush's nominee is
because he is linked to the torture memos. Friday the Executive Branch
refused to comply with a judge's order to release the remainder of the Abu
Ghraib images, which are more incendiary than those already released.

They don't believe that leaders can admit mistakes, that it's a sign of
weakness to apologize. "They" are not fit for command.

KwC

Chris, are you sure that IDF trained the UK police who killed the
electrician?  Can you give us a source for that?

Cheers,
Lawry

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christoph Reuss
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 2:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Futurework] London Assassins were Trained in Israel

Arthur Cordell wrote:
> Harry's question still stands.

Harry added:  "You needn't answer, for you are never faced with that
situation."  But since you asked, I'll answer anyway:


> I know that it would be nice to avoid grievances and for us all to live in
> peace and harmony.  But at this juncture: What to do?

Avoid adding further grievances, perhaps?  Or even --heaven forbid!--
start compensating past grievances ?


> If the police don't shoot they are blamed.  If the police shoot they are
> blamed.

As professionals we know that __wrong training__ strongly increases the
number & seriousness of mistakes.  The squad that executed the Brazilian
was trained by Israeli forces, which are well-known for being extremely
trigger-happy and for erring FAR on the safe side (safe for them, that is).
So it's not surprising that the trainees end up being the same.

It was a recipe for disaster to have these forces trained by Israel,
and this choice was also in bad taste, considering that the IDF
is the successor organization of the big terror group that
literally bombed the Brits out of Palestine in the 1940s.
If you make the fox guard the henhouse, don't be surprised about
dead hens.  As a relative of the executed man in London put it:
"We all feared the bombs, but now we fear the police just as much."


> No one has "clean hands".  Any review of history will show that each
group,
> each country, each religion, etc., has done some terrible things.  I don't
> think we can redress these things, but of course we can learn from
history.
> "Life can only be understood by looking backward, but must be lived going
> forward."

Would you accept Germans to say this in order to refuse further payments
of billion$ to Israel each year, 60+ years after the fact ?
Smells like double standards.  "I'm alright, Jack..."

And, transferring your statement to the individual level, what kind of
justice system (rule of law) would hand out the _same_ punishment (or
lack thereof) to an unrepentant mass murderer who continues to kill, and
to a slightly corrupt small banker who has more than compensated his few
fraud victims ?

It seems that with such a notion of "justice", there is little hope for
peace
indeed.  Worse: in practice, rewarding the worse guys leads to a rat-race to
the bottom, because it gives the wrong message even to the good guys.
The result is a lose-lose scenario, like now in London, with the only
winners being the ugly guys of the "security" and armaments industry,
the #1 export industry of ...hum di dum...

Chris





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword
"igve".


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to