This is all very interesting. Anybody care to speculate what it has to
do with "redesigning work, income distribution and eduction"?

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ray Harrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wow!    Is this because we are getting old or is it theoretical or what?
> Cosmology has brought all of this back to the fore because we can generally
> keep our environment stable.    However the current economic situation with
> all of the self-serving theories should put a lie to even that.
>
>
>
> I vote for Frank Herbert’s version (The Heavenmakers)  where he says that
> there are these guys out in the Universe who have constructed a reality that
> they can manipulate by turning the clock back and forth.      They start a
> story and then bet on the outcome.    Their universe looks like the modern
> opera house where you have the moles underneath working to provide the
> manipulation required by the wealthy who sit around the balconies and
> applaud.   Those moles are called the orchestra and their foreman the
> conductor.       Some of the more well heeled betters will elect to sit in
> the Orchestra for a more upfront personal view of the action.    The humans
> are on the stage and believe that they have free will even though the music
> controls their time and their every move.
>
>
>
> REH
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Darryl or
> Natalia
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:13 PM
> To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
> Subject: Re: [Futurework] Here's to mental health at 90!
>
>
>
> No, you are interpreting incorrectly. Though I may believe in an afterlife,
> I would never state that it is fact, despite ample anecdotal evidence. Even
> despite most recent quantum physics research pointing in the direction of
> ancient Vedic understanding that consciousness creates physiology, would I
> state it as fact. Excitement, certainly. But you said below that you found
> use of the journey theme hokey, deceptive, metaphorically regnant, and that
> the husband looked as though he didn't care. Now, you're saying he was
> entirely aware and lucid. I brought up the coma bit to suggest that perhaps
> the audience was unaware of a possible state of awareness--because of how
> you'd first described his indifference.
>
> The program (PBS?) on the Swiss facility showed that the people there were
> using the metaphor of a "journey" -- death was simply the next stage. It
> seemed pretty hokey to me, but the dying man's wife seemed to take comfort
> from the metaphor. I didn't get the impression that the guy cared.
>
>
>
> As long as we need and use metaphors there will be something deceptive about
> the whole process, I think. Am I being to harsh?
>
>
>
> (Harsh? Yes. Mocking.traditions/ceremonies that lend dignity to the dying
> patient.)
>
> Belief, when based in informed decision, is also choice, and choosing to
> believe that mind/consciousness cannot die is a choice for happiness, and
> people are healthier and happier for it, and it harms no one in this light.
> When the belief is merely memetic, imparted on the domestic front,
> incorporated into every aspect of one's society, and fear of "sin" guides
> your decisions, then there really isn't much choice. One will only recite by
> rote what reality is. Which leads to your latest query of my position on who
> might become the decider in your imagined scenario....
>
> I believe the example you cite would be one of murder. The sufferer has made
> his choice based on his perception of reality, despite desire of death to
> alleviate suffering, and would consider the allegedly merciful action murder
> nonetheless. He has no other theological or spiritual foundation to guide
> him, so what can you do? Respect his beliefs because they will have great
> bearing on why he thinks he should suffer. Further, presuming it's possible
> that after death one goes initially to whatever version of heaven or hell
> your belief system has shaped, then this guy will find himself going to
> hell, and that his family will soon follow. We have no way of knowing how
> long a purgatory could be--again, if that's true. Even if altogether false,
> there's the actual moment in which said victim would experience a profound
> personal negation of his entire life and soul for this act, however
> unfounded this may be. Not acceptable. Even if they did this while he was
> sleeping, he has voiced his choice. It might work out, however, if the guy
> thought his wife went to hell.
>
> How 'bout you on the above?
> Natalia
>
>
> Lawrence de Bivort wrote:
>
> Dear Natalia,
>
>
>
> No, I don't know with certainty that there is no "journey" after death.  I
> am pretty sure, though thanatology is not a field that I follow, that there
> is no evidence at all that there is, "near-death experiences" not
> withstanding.  Do you have any certain knowledge that there is a "journey"?
>  If I am reading your note correctly, you imply that you do.
>
>
>
> In the absence of ANY evidence to the contrary I choose to proceed on the
> assumption that there isn't a "journey", and to align my views and policies
> and practices with that assumption.
>
>
>
> In any case and to the point of the PBS program, the dying husband seemed
> entirely in possession of his mental capabilities, and quite aware of what
> was happening and going to happen. At each step he actively stated his
> desire to dir. His wife was supportive, but not in charge.  So this program
> sheds no light on the coma situation you discuss.
>
>
>
> You hint, I think, to something that intrigues me: should others ever have
> the right/responsibility to plan for and in effect order someone else's
> death? Supposing the subject is suffering terribly but, let us say, for
> religious reasons unable to ask for their own death for fear, say, of "going
> to Hell and not being reunited with his beloved dead wife."  The subject
> congruently states his desire to die, but for this
> suicide-means-you-are-going-to-Hell. Should his loving family decide that he
> should die, as he congruently wishes, and take the matter into their own
> hands, thus freeing him from the burden and, in his mind, consequence of
> suicide?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Lawry
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Darryl or Natalia wrote:
>
> Hi Lawry,
>
> Are you stating below that you know with certainty that there is no journey
> after physical death? Perhaps I'm misinterpreting.
>
> You also speak as though you felt this ceremony was being done solely for
> the wife's (and friends) benefit, yet most couples tend to honour the
> wishes/wills of their spouses, issues discussed/penned well before demise.
> That the husband seemed indifferent could be the indicator that his time to
> be able to react to anything was pretty well up--possibly a vegetative
> state, I don't know. That people even in coma states are often aware of
> what's going on around them has been proven very recently by use of PET
> scans. CBC did a show on it recently, and I've posted The Associated Press
> Link below.
>
> I don't wish to throw a wrench into the Choice debate by raising the
> following, as in, How do we really know if the person really wants to die?
> My point is only that it's possible people are more aware of their
> condition/journey/passage/dying than we may realize, and I hope that's the
> case. Since it's a major event, it's best experienced with full knowledge,
> and with luck, by choice if suffering unbearably.
>
> I believe that choice is crucial and an intrinsic right, and grieve for
> those in higher numbers succumbing within morphine-induced finalities.
>
> Natalia
>
> Man in coma conscious for decades
>
> 'I screamed but there was nothing to hear,' Belgian patient says
>
> Last Updated: Monday, November 23, 2009 | 4:50 PM ET
>
> The Associated Press
>
> Patients in a vegetative state can't think, reason, respond, do anything on
> purpose, chew or swallow. (CBC)
>
> A man who emerged from what doctors thought was a vegetative state says he
> was fully conscious for 23 years but could not respond because he was
> paralyzed, his mother said Monday.
>
> Rom Houben, 46, had a car crash in 1983 and doctors thought he had sunk into
> a coma. His family continued to believe their son was conscious and sought
> further medical advice.
>
> Professor Steven Laureys of Belgium's Coma Science Group realized that the
> diagnosis was wrong and taught Houben how to communicate through a special
> keyboard, said Dr. Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse, who is on Laureys' team.
>
> Rom used the device to tell a reporter for the German magazine Der Spiegel
> that: "I screamed but there was nothing to hear."
>
> Belgian doctors who treated him early on said that Rom had gone from a coma
> into a vegetative condition.
>
> Coma is a state of unconsciousness in which the eyes are closed and the
> patient can't be roused, as if simply asleep.
>
> Vegetative state is a condition in which the eyes are open and can move, and
> the patient has periods of sleep and periods of wakefulness, but remains
> unconscious and unaware of him or herself or others. The patient can't
> think, reason, respond, do anything on purpose, chew or swallow.
>
> But Rom's parents would not accept that he was comatose or vegetative.
>
> Indicating yes or no
>
> His mother, Fina Houben, said in a telephone interview that they took him
> five times to the United States for tests.
>
> More searching finally got her in touch with Laureys, who put Houben through
> a PET scan that indicated he was conscious. The family and doctors then
> began trying to establish communication.
>
> An advance came when he was able to indicate yes or no by slightly moving
> his foot to push a computer device placed there by Laureys' team. Then came
> the spelling of words using his finger and a touch-screen attached to his
> wheelchair.
>
> "You have to imagine yourself lying in bed wanting to speak and move but
> unable to do so — while in your head you are OK," Vanhaudenhuyse said. "It
> was extremely difficult for him and he showed a lot of anger, which is
> normal since he was very frustrated," she said.
>
> The case came to light after Laureys published a study in the journal BMC
> Neurology this year showing that about four out of 10 patients with
> consciousness disorders are wrongly diagnosed as being a vegetative state.
> Houben, although not specifically mentioned, was part of the study.
>
> Houben has started writing a book on his experiences.
>
> Read more:
> http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2009/11/23/coma-recovery-belgium.html#ixzz0uQs3yo4q
>
>
>
>
>
> Lawrence de Bivort wrote:
>
> The program (PBS?) on the Swiss facility showed that the people there were
> using the metaphor of a "journey" -- death was simply the next stage. It
> seemed pretty hokey to me, but the dying man's wife seemed to take comfort
> from the metaphor. I didn't get the impression that the guy cared.
>
>
>
> As long as we need and use metaphors there will be something deceptive about
> the whole process, I think. Am I being to harsh?
>
>
>
> Friends in a little, religious, and poor town in Colorado threw a farewell
> bash for the dying man, and then after they left he took poisons. I was told
> that everyone knew what was going to happen, and they all thought it was the
> right decision, and were glad that their friend had not only the choice but
> the moral ability to implement it.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Lawry
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2010, at 2:50 PM, Ed Weick wrote:
>
> The movie Soylent Green has a passage about this kind of thing.  When they
> are ready to die and leave the abysmal place the world has become, people
> can go to a place in which they are put onto a comfortable stretcher and
> wheeled into theater.  They are then given chemicals that will make them
> close down.  As they are doing so, beautiful music is played (parts of
> Beethoven's Pastoral in the movie) and scenes of deer in pastures and
> bounding through woods are projected onto a large screen above them.  What a
> way to go!
>
>
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: Lawrence de Bivort
>
> To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION
>
> Cc: 'Keith Hudson'
>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:31 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [Futurework] Here's to mental health at 90!
>
>
>
>
>
> Agreed, Keith, Though I don't know about the bludgeoning!  More and more,
> people seem less fearful of death. Perhaps that fear was derived from the
> religiously promoted threats of heaven and hell?  My sense is that many
> people have attained such a level of quality in their lives that losing much
> of that quality in the face of the infirmities of age is unacceptable.  And
> with our longer live-spans it may be easier to conclude that one has led a
> good life and that it is time to wrap it up.  Some of my friends talk about
> pacts among themselves to make sure that their last days are not spent in
> hopeless agony. Going to a service in Switzerland may be the best option now
> -- though a program I saw about it some time ago made it seem too austere
> for my tastes -- is an expensive option and like so much else, the virtues
> of 'grow and buy local' may extend themselves to this end-of-life realm.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Lawry
>
>
>
> Arthur,
>
> Over here the idea of euthanasia is proceeding far faster than I would have
> expected even as recently as a year or two ago. My partner and I have both
> signed a legal Advance Notices (requesting non-resuscitation in case of
> severe debilitation, etc), and there are increasing numbers of press stories
> about individuals (usually the totally paralysed with locked-in minds who
> can only communicate by blinking) who want to be sent on their way, retired
> doctors who confess to mercy killings when they practised, and there's a
> growing stream of people leaving for the clinic in Switzerland that does
> this thing.
>
> I think that well within 20 years -- when there'll be huge numbers of the
> old -- we'll see voluntary euthanasia on a large scale. I think we'll start
> to see a lot more involuntary euthanasia than already goes on in our nursing
> homes. My guess is that, already, hundreds, if not thousands, of cases go on
> every year that are never revealed.
>
> As recently as 200 years ago when Scandinavian families in the far north had
> had a bad summer and insufficient food to see them through the winter if
> they had an aged parent on board, they would hold a ceremony (usually on a
> particular family rock) whereby the ancient was clubbed to death (with their
> permission). Once we get this Christian thing about souls and so forth out
> of our head then euthanasia of anybody who's become a severe economic drain
> will become culturally acceptable. It will take generations but, I think,
> inevitable. It seems terribly shocking to us now but it will be normal then.
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Futurework mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
>
> Virus Database (VPS): 100721-0, 07/21/2010
>
> Tested on: 7/21/2010 12:18:48 PM
>
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 AVAST Software.
>
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Futurework mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
>
> Virus Database (VPS): 100722-1, 07/22/2010
>
> Tested on: 7/22/2010 12:07:42 PM
>
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 AVAST Software.
>
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>
>



-- 
Sandwichman

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to