Natalia wrote: > If all water were dead, we, who require water to live, would also be dead.
That's the logical fallacy. You fail to distinguish between a necessary and a sufficient prerequisite. Cars require gasoline to drive 100mph. Does that mean gasoline can drive 100mph? Besides, if water would live, it could multiply (like all lifeforms can). Hint: No single element (or lump of equal molecules) lives. > Have you heard of Dr. Masaru Emoto? He wrote three volumes of books, the > first called /The Hidden Mesages of Water. /I'll sum it up for you. > Water responds to music and to thought. Google it. Physical formation/variation of crystals does not mean living. Btw, do you think water in the Alps can read Japanese? > What are you trying to say with this bit: > > /Suggesting that water is alive, as Parry did, is esoterical nonsense. > That's how Predators hijack science./ Esoterical Predators connect unrelated things. For example, there was this homeopath who lectured about "the power of water" (to praise the alleged healing power of his homeopathic mixtures). To "prove" this power, he mentioned the examples of the oxy-hydrogen explosion and the hydrogen bomb in the same sentence. The uneducated audience was very impressed by this "scientist" (who had never attended a university). Chris _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
