"The truck smugglers of the Sahara say that the good thing about brake fluid is that it keeps you away from the battery acid." -- Wade Davis, The Wayfinders
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Darryl or Natalia <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Christoph Reuss wrote: > > Natalia wrote: > > > If all water were dead, we, who require water to live, would also be dead. > > > That's the logical fallacy. You fail to distinguish between a necessary > and a sufficient prerequisite. Cars require gasoline to drive 100mph. > Does that mean gasoline can drive 100mph? > > Besides, if water would live, it could multiply (like all lifeforms can). > Hint: No single element (or lump of equal molecules) lives. > > > Is that gasoline analogy like the one about the virtuoso's violin going up > in value because of the its inherent tone? You are comparing apples to > oranges. Gas has never shaped automobiles in the way that water has done for > our planet and for life on it. > Try going for a week or two without water-based beverages or food, and get > back to me. > > I would argue that reproduction is not the only validation for life signs. > With vitality in healthy water comes an energy, and with it the power to > transform at the cellular level. If you drink stale water, you get sick or > die. Drinking from ancient unpolluted glacier sources can revive in a way > that our toxic surface water cannot. > > We come back to the question of whether or not Gaia lives. Whether or not > one can communicate with nature. Perhaps just another choice for happiness, > but I buy it. > > > Have you heard of Dr. Masaru Emoto? He wrote three volumes of books, the > first called /The Hidden Mesages of Water. /I'll sum it up for you. > Water responds to music and to thought. Google it. > > > Physical formation/variation of crystals does not mean living. > Btw, do you think water in the Alps can read Japanese? > > > No. It does perhaps indicate that there's a medium of sensitivity, a > response to intent on the part of mind. > > What are you trying to say with this bit: > > /Suggesting that water is alive, as Parry did, is esoterical nonsense. > That's how Predators hijack science./ > > > I would think that attributing life, or at the very least, the giver of > life, to water would be in the best interests of those who know that water > is what keeps this planet going, and those who understand that it shouldn't > be exploited by Predators. > > > Esoterical Predators connect unrelated things. For example, > there was this homeopath who lectured about "the power of water" > (to praise the alleged healing power of his homeopathic mixtures). > To "prove" this power, he mentioned the examples of the > oxy-hydrogen explosion and the hydrogen bomb in the same sentence. > The uneducated audience was very impressed by this "scientist" > (who had never attended a university). > > > Yeah, well, there are Predators everywhere, exploiting everything. Pharma > kills more per capita than the occasional delusional scientist with their > natural remedies. Pharma wants us to believe that toxic chemicals are the > essentials to life. > > *Natalia * > > Chris > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Futurework mailing > [email protected]https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework > > > _______________________________________________ > Futurework mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework > > -- Sandwichman
_______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
