The Aspen: /Populus grandidentat/a, Populus tremuloides for 2 of our native species. The second of which I believe Black Elk speaks of as the Tree of Nations from his vision. Yes? So the Sioux felt (knew deeply) that this tree in particular, among all the other tree genus' is the one to hold as The Staff. And only now through the words that explain ideas can the white man begin to have a similar (but not same) understanding. Should I say as dissimilar as mind is to spirit?

Darryl


On 24/07/2012 9:15 AM, Ray Harrell wrote:

Thanks Darryl. On one level I think of God as represented by the "other" in the womb but on another level I think of the Aspen tree that is the largest life form thus far discovered on the planet. It has millions of individual trees growing from its body which is underground and covers many Western states in the U.S. Recent DNA studies have found that it is a single plant and that it is a male Aspen. There are female Aspens as well. But they don't need each other unless they have to take to the air. I think of individuals as the trees that grow out from the core, have a life cycle and then return to that core. Humanity is a dream of that totality that can act and move around like the fecundity when the male and female are necessary to each other. That's why the Lakota call the "tree nation" "Standing People." That is also why the Aztecs called the core values Omoteotl and Omotecutli, Grandfather/Grandmother.

REH

*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *D & N
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:11 AM
*To:* RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
*Subject:* Re: [Futurework] 'Dark Knight Rises' shooting: Three heroesdied inAurora taking bullets for their girlfriends - NY Daily News

But when God is only an external Whose wishes and concerns are "told" to us by /someone else/, we each lose our "manifest destiny". We lose our responsibility (responsibility to ourselves, to one another, to all that has been created for us in this "reality" *and* to God. One may say we even lose our purpose for being (being here). So, I have felt for a long time that those "religions" that seek control of individuals, communities, societies and nations "/in the name of God/" have actually corrupted the very concept of God by separating us (the individual) from our own "Godness", from the spirit within ; that which is present in All, that which connects each and every life on this planet as well as those lives we do not understand - yet. But we must look within to find that which is without. Once found, then, I believe, that "feeling" can be communicated. I believe words can only convey an arbitrary idea, /feelings/ are the vibrations of life, of the spirit, of God. Further - those "things" that pluck at the "feelings" are what should matter in this realm of being; more, much more than the mental exercise of analysis and concept. Thus the Arts convey more truth than any other "discipline" we have invented.

Darryl

On 24/07/2012 4:14 AM, Ed Weick wrote:

    We all need our gods because we exist in an insecure place,
    somewhere between birth and death (what comes before, what comes
    after?), between the infinitesimal and the infinite, and between
    humanity and brutality.  We don't know where we are and have
    always needed a god or gods to guide and protect us.

    Ed

        ----- Original Message -----

        *From:*Ray Harrell <mailto:[email protected]>

        *To:*'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION'
        <mailto:[email protected]>

        *Sent:*Monday, July 23, 2012 8:14 PM

        *Subject:*Re: [Futurework] 'Dark Knight Rises' shooting: Three
        heroesdied inAurora taking bullets for their girlfriends - NY
        Daily News

        In Shamanism each individual is a part of the great mystery,
        the Eternal Spirit breathed in with the first breath from the
        Lifegiver.   The mother is not the Breathgiver.   In the
        search for the choice of your God, your Ultimate Concern, the
        Center post of your reality,  It is not enough to think male
        or female and often they are referred to as "they" and as
        Grandfather/Grandmother.    Lots of examples.   Because the
        spirit is eternal and is breath, the spirit chooses which
        family, people, etc to live in.    The Great Mystery which is
        eternal, omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent manifests in
        the temporary and dances a dance of life within us all.   To a
        Christian, only Jesus does that because only Jesus is the true
        Son of God but Jesus said to his students, "So are we all sons
        of God."  That is what the Shaman says as they follow the
        drama in this "Field of Plenty."   We are all God acting out
        and we are not.    There are things that God discovers through
        us and that we cannot know as actors on this plane of existence.

        REH

        *From:*[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
        *Ed Weick
        *Sent:* Monday, July 23, 2012 5:11 PM
        *To:* RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
        *Subject:* Re: [Futurework] 'Dark Knight Rises' shooting:
        Three heroes died inAurora taking bullets for their
        girlfriends - NY Daily News

        Ray, God became the "father" when early Christians, not being
        accepted by the Jews from whom they emerged, had to sell
        themselves to the broader world - a Greco-Roman world.  Heroes
        and great cult figures of that world -- think Hercules,
        Perseus, and many others --  were typically produced by the
        union of a male god and a mortal female.  To be effective in
        the larger world, Christ, a Jewish rebel against Rome and
        against many of the powers and practices of Judaism, thus had
        to be converted into the "Son of God".

        Ed

            ----- Original Message -----

            *From:*Ray Harrell <mailto:[email protected]>

            *To:*'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION'
            <mailto:[email protected]>

            *Sent:*Monday, July 23, 2012 11:49 AM

            *Subject:*Re: [Futurework] 'Dark Knight Rises' shooting:
            Three heroes died inAurora taking bullets for their
            girlfriends - NY Daily News

            I think it is more about being loyal to the personal bonds
            that they set up.   The wealthy are true to their
            "culture" as they put it but work hard to separate and
            individuate from parents.   For the non-pyscho analyzed
            poor, every woman is a  younger representative of a mother
            that has sacrificed for them.   I would add that the
            initial image of God is the "other" in the perinatal
            universe and that's the mother as well.   Later it is
            transferred to the father and God becomes male.

            REH

            *From:*[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
            Of *D & N
            *Sent:* Monday, July 23, 2012 10:27 AM
            *To:* RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
            *Subject:* Re: [Futurework] 'Dark Knight Rises' shooting:
            Three heroes died in Aurora taking bullets for their
            girlfriends - NY Daily News

            Perhaps the very life of a wealthy person (being brought
            up to believe they are "better than" - and "more deserving
            of life than") anyone else (including those of other
            wealthy families - whether male or female) creates a sense
            of "self preservation" which would not appear to
            themselves as acts of cowardice. Whereas the poorer of
            societies have been conditioned to "serve" and "sacrifice"
            (be thrust onto the front lines of any battle the insane
            greed of wealth considers important for their continuation
            of that wealth and power.

            D.

            On 23/07/2012 12:03 AM, Ray Harrell wrote:

                Well thought out reply.  However, would the lower
                class men locked in the lower sections of the Titanic
                have given their lives more readily for their women
                than the upper class men who crowded the boats?     In
                this case, one of the people who protected his girl
                friend was military and died.    The other young man
                with his girl friend, both of whom were studded and
                ear plugged with body piercings, didn't look like he
                would have been cowardly.   It also stated that her
                brother, who survived, had  thrown himself over his
                girl friend and got her out of the theater. Those
                people are generally pretty fearless and passionate in
                a way that makes protecting their girl friends likely
                I would say.

                I agree with Keith about learning from the shooter but
                we can also learn why the upper class would be more
                likely to take a woman's place in the lifeboat while
                the lower class would consider such a thing
                unacceptable.   At least that's my experience. My
                military experience was an interesting situation
                considering such things.    I would say that it was a
                matter of "bonding" that made defense of the helpless
                an ordinary living strategy.      The military works
                very hard to inculcate the idea of fighting and
                protecting as the ordinary work of soldiers.   The
                term "extraordinary actions"  become ordinary in the
                life and work of a soldier.    That would make me
                believe what I read.    REH

                *From:*[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>
                [mailto:[email protected]] *On
                Behalf Of *Keith Hudson
                *Sent:* Monday, July 23, 2012 12:56 AM
                *To:* RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,
                EDUCATION; Arthur Cordell
                *Subject:* Re: [Futurework] 'Dark Knight Rises'
                shooting: Three heroes died in Aurora taking bullets
                for their girlfriends - NY Daily News

                Arthur,

                My comment is that I strongly doubt the literal
                accuracy of this news account. Men are more inclined
                to be heroic in emergencies because males,
                intrinsically, are more risk-taking than females. For
                example, in the Zeebrugge ferry disaster in 1987 (in
                which 193 passengers and crew died), I remember
                reading at the time that one young man, in dangerous
                circumstances, helped many passengers to escape from
                being trapped below. But the total weight of evidence
                from many ship disasters over the years says that men
                take to the lifeboats disproportionately to women and
                children. There were examples of this, I believe,
                during the Ttitanic sinking.

                All stories of tragedies tend to get enhanced from the
                word go. I can well imagine three young men throwing
                their arms around their girl friends and then trying
                to flee together or take cover. But if three of the
                six were to die then it's only 8:1 against three men
                rather than girls being hit.

                Incidentally, I'm glad that the police didn't kill
                Holmes at Aurora. As with Breivik's massacres a year
                ago in Norway, and his arrest, we need to know a great
                deal more about the early life stories of these men
                (usually social isolates) to identify other potential
                misfits at as young an age as possible in order to
                hopefully deflect their development.

                Keith

                At 04:26 23/07/2012, you wrote:


                Way off topic but sort of intriguing.

                Arthur


                To: '[email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>'
                Subject: FW: 'Dark Knight Rises' shooting: Three
                heroes died in Aurora
                taking bullets for their girlfriends - NY Daily News

                Interesting.  The response of the male seems to be to
                protect.  Instinctive?
                Who knows.  Maybe Keith has an answer or would care to
                comment.

                Arthur
                'Dark Knight Rises' shooting: Three heroes died in
                Aurora taking bullets for
                their girlfriends In final acts of valor, Jon Blunk,
                Matt McQuinn and Alex
                Teves used their bodies to shield their girlfriends as
                accused madman James
                Holmes turned the Aurora cineplex into a shooting gallery.

                Read more:
                
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/aurora-shooting-died-bullets-sweeti

                es-article-1.1119395#ixzz21Oy21I65

                http://tinyurl.com/c9sj52m
                
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/aurora-shooting-died-bullets-sweeti

                es-article-1.1119395
                Sent from my iPad

                Keith Hudson, Saltford, England
                http://allisstatus.wordpress.com
                <http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/>




                _______________________________________________

                Futurework mailing list

                [email protected]  
<mailto:[email protected]>

                https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

            
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            _______________________________________________
            Futurework mailing list
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------

        _______________________________________________
        Futurework mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework




    _______________________________________________

    Futurework mailing list

    [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]>

    https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to