Hi Ed,
Faith inspired by love creates hope(and sometimes joy). Selma is trying her hardest to point us in hopeful directions. Why rain on her parade?

Take care,
Brian





Selma, Tikopia was one of the small south Pacific Islands devasted by a
cyclone earlier this year.  It's population was a little over a thousand.  I
would be very skeptical that what is possible for a population that small
would be possible for a population of many millions.  In a family, or in a
small community, we can perhaps achieve what the Tikopians are alleged to
have achieved, but I would suggest that is probably about the limit.

And I even have doubts about small communities.  The small communities I
lived in as a kid had their worthies and unworthies, their included and
their excluded, those who were allowed and able to participate and those who
were not.

Ed

Ed Weick
577 Melbourne Ave.
Ottawa, ON, K2A 1W7
Canada
Phone (613) 728 4630
Fax     (613)  728 9382

----- Original Message -----

 Harry responded to my comments about the capitalistic context causing
 individuals to be treated as commodities. This seems an appropriate place
to
 try to describe some of the ideas discussed by Dorothy Lee in the little
 book I keep referring to  *Freedom and Culture*

 You will see that this discussion is very closely related to a post I sent
 yesterday with a quote from David Bohm's *Wholeness and the Implicate
Order*
 and you will also see that it is directly related to the recent discussion
 on this list of who should clean the toilets.

 Lee has a chapter entitled 'The Joy of Work as Participation'. She writes
of
 having made a discovery while she was working on a Christmas present for
one
 of her children on Christmas Eve when it was very late, she was exhausted
 and "I was working against time, wishing I were in bed."

 She also speaks of the conflicts she was experiencing at this time, trying
 to balance her work as an anthropologist with her responsibilities to her
 two children, her husband and her home. She felt guilty about neglecting
her
 professional work and needed to justify whatever she did for the family;
 making a blanket for the doll crib of her 3-year-old daughter seemed
 justifiable because she couldn't afford to buy it.

 "As I sewed this Christmas Eve, I was suddenly astonished to discover that
I
 had started to add an entirely unpremeditated and unnecessary edging of
 embroidery, and, simultaneously, I was aware of a deep enjoyment in what I
 was doing. It was a feeling that had nothing to do with the pleasure the
 work would give to my daughter on the morrow; it had nothing to do with a
 sense of achievement, or of virtue in duty accomplished. And I knew that I
 had never liked to embroider. There was no justification for my work; yet
it
 was the source of such a deep satisfaction, that the late hour and my
 fatigue had ceased to exist for me.

 At this moment of discovery, I knew that I was experiencing what it meant
to
 be a social being, not merely Dorothy Lee, an individual; I knew that I
had
 truly become a mother, a wife, a neighbor, a teacher. I realized  that
some
 boundary had disappeared, so that I was working in a social medium; that I
 was not working for the future pleasure of a distant daughter, but rather
 within a relationship unaffected by temporality or physical absence. What
 gave meaning to my work was the medium in which I was working-the medium
of
 love, in a broad sense. So far, my rationalization and justification of my
 work had obscured this meaning, had cut me off from my own social context.
 It suddently became clear to me that it did not matter whether I was
 scrubbing the kitchen floor or darning stockings or zipping up snowsuits;
 these all had meaning, not in themselves, but in terms of the situation of
 which they were a part. They contained social value because they
implemented
 the value of the social situation.
 >
 This was a tremendous discovery for me, illuminating in a flash my
 experience and my thinking. My mind went immediately to the Tikopia, about
 whom I had been reading, and I said to myself, 'This is the way the
Tikopia
 work.' I had been puzzled about the motivating forces in the life of the
 Tikopia. These were people who were without organized leadership in work,
 yet who carried out large undertakings. And without any  authority to
impose
 legislation and mete out punishment, the business of the village was
carried
 out and law and order were maintained. Raymond Firth, the ethnographer,
 answering the unspoken quesitons of western readers, spoke of obligations,
 duty, fear of adverse opinion, as motivations. I did not like his choice
of
 words, because he spoke of the obligation to perform unpleasant tasks, for
 example, and yet the situations he described brimmed with joy. Now I saw
 that the Tikopia did not need external incentives.

 This was all very well, but when I came to examine my discovery, I could
not
 explain it in any rational or acceptable way. My society did not structure
 working situations as occasions which contained their own satisfaction;
and
 it assumed  the existence of aggregates or collections of indiividuals,
not
 of a social continuum. I had learned to believe in the existence of a
 distinct self, relating itself externally to work as a means to an end,
with
 external incentives and external rewards. yet it was obvious that if I got
 satsisfaction from participating in a situation, there must be some
medium,
 some continuum, within which this participation can take place, If my
family
 and I were aspects of one whole; there must be some positive apprehension
of
 a continuity which made me an aspect of my family, not a separate member;
it
 was not enough to say that my physical being and my sensory experience did
 not in themselves prescribe the limits of the self."

 She goes on to explore the meaning of self among the Tikopia; I'll leave
 that for another time.

 I would just ask the members of this list if they have ever experienced
 anything similar to what Lee describes as she was working on that blanket.
I
 know I have and I have felt it as a gift of enormous proportions; mostly,
in
 our society, it occurs in spite of the social and economic environment,
not
 because of it. But I strongly believe that it is possible to stucture a
 society and to develop cultural values that make this kind of experience
 possible and common for everyone.
 > Selma,
 >
 >


 Harry:
  When was the labor of individuals not bought and sold.
 >
 > It seems to me this was always the case in Europe. So to blame
capitalism
 > merely shifts focus from the real problem. It wasn't true when there was
 > plenty of free land available in North America. But that didn't last
long
 > and soon there was no alternative but to work for what one could get -
 > which as Ricardo shrewdly noted moved downward toward subsistence.
 >
 > This is the case now. It is hidden now by all kinds of welfare
 > distributions. The social and political sciences spend their energies on
 > how much welfare will not be too much, but no-one seems to be
 investigating
 > why welfare is necessary.
 >
 > But, it's not capitalism that is the issue. This is just the latest
 > manifestation  of the same old problem that has kept the peoples of all
 > countries in penury for centuries.
 >
 > Harry
 >
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 >
 > Selma wrote:
 >
 > >Ray,
 > >
 > >I have been convinced, for many decades now, that Marx and some that
 > >followed him were correct when they argued that, in a capitalistic
 system,
 > >where the labor of individuals is bought and sold, those individuals
 thereby
 > >become commodities that are bought and sold. In such a society the
 general
 > >consciousness becomes one of people being commodities and therefore,
the
 > >kind of connection you are talking about and the spirituality I have
been
 > >talking about are not possible.
 > > >
 > >I am thinking, in particular, of Erich Fromm's arguments in *To Have or
 To
 > >Be*.
 > >
 > >Selma
 >
 >
 > ******************************
 > Harry Pollard
 > Henry George School of LA
 > Box 655
 > Tujunga  CA  91042
 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > Tel: (818) 352-4141
 > Fax: (818) 353-2242
 > *******************************
 >
 >


 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
 ----


 >
 > ---
 > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
 > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
 > Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/2003
 >

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

--
**************************************************
*  Brian McAndrews, Practicum Coordinator        *
*  Faculty of Education, Queen's University      *
*  Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6                     *
*  FAX:(613) 533-6596  Phone (613) 533-6000x74937*
*  e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]            *
*  "Education is not the filling of a pail,      *
*   but the lighting of a fire.                  *
*                 W.B.Yeats                      *
*                                                *
**************************************************

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to