Carric Dooley wrote:
> Trust me... MS Proxy will probably never be able to come anywhere NEAR CSM.
> I personally would'nt inflict MS Proxy on my worst enemies...
>
Actually I would if it was my WORST enemy! Consider the recent virus problems IS
organizations have been having. MS has known about these types of virus for at
least one year and yet did nothing until it cost the world nearly $10 Billion. A
least some due diligence... Anything! I sincerely believe that there should be a
class action law suit against MS. My 2 cents.
Regards, Richard
>
> 2000 may be an upgrade, but it's like trading sh*t for slightly better sh*t.
> You just can't polish a turd.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rick Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 6:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [FW1] ms 2000 proxy
>
> >
> > actually, simultaneous connections could exceed 2-3,000; and even go up to
> > 5,000.
> > if ms proxy requires a winsock client...is the winsock client already on
> > 95/98/nt desktops, are is this a seperate installation?
> > i'm wondering now if csm can support 5,000 concurrent connections, since
> it
> > does not require a client from the desktop!?
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dean Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: 'Rick Francis' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thursday, May 18, 2000 4:56 PM
> > Subject: RE: [FW1] ms 2000 proxy
> >
> >
> > >Hi Rick,
> > >
> > >MS proxy provides transparent authentication and logging of all accesses
> > >through it for http/https/ftp also winsock and socks proxy. It will
> handle
> > >multiple domains and logs username
> > >
> > >I have seen people here on the list use it for a 1000+ users (for me I
> have
> > >200+ users, up to 15 concurrent)
> > >Other people on the list also use CSM proxy for user bases in the
> '000's(as
> > >you saw from your other post is csm ntlm compliant)
> > >
> > >In our case MSP just runs. I have not used CSM proxy.
> > >
> > >Perhaps an idea of your user size and estimated concurrent users, may
> help
> > >others with providing advice on csm or msp for your site.
> > >
> > >cheers
> > >deanc
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Rick Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Friday, 19 May 2000 9:37 AM
> > >To: Dean Cunningham; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: [FW1] ms 2000 proxy
> > >
> > >
> > >i want to authenticate/cache/log nt domain users (from a lot of domains)
> as
> > >they out the internet through a firewall.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Dean Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Date: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 11:12 PM
> > >Subject: RE: [FW1] ms 2000 proxy
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>Rick,
> > >>
> > >>can you define what you want to do with ms proxy, act as a firewall or
> > have
> > >>it as a http/ftp etc. proxy?
> > >>
> > >>ms proxy 2000 has yet to be released , as far as I know.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: Jim Noble (INFO1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >>Sent: Thursday, 18 May 2000 1:19 PM
> > >>To: Rick Francis; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Subject: RE: [FW1] ms 2000 proxy
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rick
> > >>Francis
> > >>Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 8:53 PM
> > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>Subject: [FW1] ms 2000 proxy
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>it'd be great if any one could praise or cry foul about ms 2000 proxy.
> > >>let us know.
> > >>rick
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >>==========================================================================
> > =
> > >=
> > >>====
> > >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions
> at
> > >> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> >
> >>==========================================================================
> > =
> > >=
> > >>====
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >>==========================================================================
> > =
> > >=
> > >>====
> > >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions
> at
> > >> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> >
> >>==========================================================================
> > =
> > >=
> > >>====
> > >>***************************************************
> > >>This e-mail is not an official statement of the
> > >>Waikato Regional Council unless otherwise stated.
> > >>Visit our website http://www.ew.govt.nz
> > >>***************************************************
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >>==========================================================================
> > =
> > >=====
> > >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions
> at
> > >> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> >
> >>==========================================================================
> > =
> > >=====
> > >***************************************************
> > >This e-mail is not an official statement of the
> > >Waikato Regional Council unless otherwise stated.
> > >Visit our website http://www.ew.govt.nz
> > >***************************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ============================================================================
> ====
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> >
> ============================================================================
> ====
> >
>
> ================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ================================================================================
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
