On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Josh Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In support of Bradley Holt I propose: > > Zend Framework: The agile enterprise framework for web 2.0 :) Brilliant! > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Bradley Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Ugh, what the heck is the word > > enterprise<http://terrychay.com/blog/article/enterprise-scalability.shtml>suppose > > to mean in this context, anyways? I'd attempt to actively avoid the > > following buzzwords, especially in slogans: > > > > - enterprise > > - web 2.0 > > - agile (this one isn't *quite* as bad as it has a more clear > > definition) > > > > These buzzwords can mean many things to different people so don't really > > communicate much when used in a slogan. With enterprise, for example, I > > doubt the majority of ZF users in-fact work in an enterprise-size company. > > "Enterprises" may, in fact, be the target market for the *commercial*end of > > ZF. However, we have a vague notion that if it's for "enterprise" it > > must be good. But, since we don't work for an enterprise-size company, we > > don't really know what those aspects are so not much is really communicated > > here other than, "it's good" which doesn't carry much substance. In other > > words, if your truly saying "enterprise" to *directly* target actual > > enterprise-size companies, that's fine. But it comes across more as > > targeting those of us who don't work at an enterprise-size company but think > > that it must be good if it's good for enterprises. I think there are a lot > > of great things to be said about ZF that are more substantive. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Joó Ádám <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > My favourite is Enterprise-strength PHP. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Ádám > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Bradley Holt > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- Bradley Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
